REF-013 · Brick et al., 2016 · Frontiers in Physiology, · Paper

Attention and self-regulation during endurance performance: a metacognitive framework (Brick 2016)

Blimited evidenceMeasured on a mixed groupWritten before October 2026, being re-checked

Overview

Brick, MacIntyre and Campbell give a cognitive account of self-regulation during endurance performance: how an athlete balances speed or power to reach an optimal result, and how what the athlete thinks about influences effort perception, physiological responses and performance.

They propose that effective cognitive control needs both proactive, goal-driven and reactive, stimulus-driven processes, and give metacognition — monitoring and controlling one's own thoughts — a central role. The framework is illustrated with Bradley Wiggins' 2015 Hour record. No experiment is reported; the paper is a perspective built on existing evidence.

Key Findings

Skilled endurance athletes flexibly SWITCH between associative (monitoring body/effort/pace) and dissociative (distraction) focus depending on demand — not a fixed "associative is better" rule
Association tends to dominate at high intensity / near limits; dissociation can help at low intensity or for affect regulation
Meta-cognition (knowing when to switch) is the trainable skill, more than the strategy itself
The authors flag a possible cost: sustained cognitive effort during long, strenuous events may itself be fatiguing
[CORRECTED] The prior "8-12% power retention / 20-min test / lactate-clearance / dropout" figures were unsourced (not from this paper) and removed — the cited review reports no such numbers

Practical Application

Coach attention as a switchable skill, not a fixed setting. Near the limit — hard intervals, the closing part of a hard effort — cue association: cadence control, breathing rhythm, muscle engagement, rather than counting down time or watching scenery.

At low intensity, or when the aim is mood and boredom management, dissociation is a legitimate choice, not a failure of discipline. The trainable part is the meta-cognition — noticing which focus the moment calls for and moving between them — so rehearse both in training instead of drilling one strategy.

Attach no performance figures to this: the source is a conceptual review and reports none.

Limitations

Conceptual review without systematic method or new data; the attentional-switching account is a framework, not a tested intervention
How this entry was checked and changed
Why this level

[CLAIM CORRECTED 2026-07-09]

Content correction 2026-09-27
Overview said Brick et al. "examined how elite cyclists ... perform" and that associative strategies "proved significantly more effective" -> the paper is a conceptual review with no experiment and argues for flexible switching, as the entry's own Key Findings already stated; Overview rewritten from the abstract.
Added the abstract's caution about the cost of sustained cognitive effort; Limitations section added.