REF-047 · Rønnestad et al., 2022 · Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, · Paper

Multiple seasons of heavy strength training → strength + cycling sprint power in elite cyclists

Blimited evidenceMeasured on elite to world-class athletesWritten before October 2026, being re-checked

Participants

n=4 elite cyclists in part one (two performed heavy strength training (HST) across two preparatory periods, ~1.5 years; two continued endurance training only). Part two follows two of them further: one continued HST for two more years; the other started HST and performed it across the last two preparatory periods.

Protocol

Multi-season case report in elite XCO MTB cyclists (from the abstract). Part one: two cyclists added heavy strength training (HST) to their training across two preparatory periods (1.5 years), while two others continued with endurance training only.
Part two: one HST cyclist continued HST for 2 more years (four preparatory periods, 3.5 years in total); the other, who had not done HST in part one, performed HST across the last two preparatory periods.
Measures: leg press force and cycling sprint power across preparatory and competition periods.

Overview

Rønnestad tracked elite XCO-MTB riders who combined heavy strength training with their endurance work over several preparatory periods.

By the end of preparatory period one (November to April), leg-press force and cycling sprint power rose on average by 16% with HST, and this gain held through the competition period; once the next preparatory period was done, the gain over the first test reached 22% for leg-press force and 19% for sprint power. Neither measure changed in the two cyclists who did no HST.

One rider who continued HST over four preparatory periods finished 3.5 years later at +44% leg-press force, with sprint power up 25% after levelling off between the third and fourth period; the rider who started HST later improved force by 24% and sprint power by 22% after 1.5 years — similar to part one.

As the authors read it, HST yields reasonable strength gains in elite cyclists over multiple preparatory periods, these adaptations survive competition periods, and sprint power roughly tracks leg-press performance.

Key Findings

Leg-press force and cycling sprint power: +16% (mean) after the first preparatory period with HST; maintained during the competition period
After the second preparatory period: +22% force, +19% sprint power from the first test
No HST (two cyclists): no change in either measure
Long run: +44% leg-press force after 3.5 years of HST; sprint power +25% with a plateau in the last two periods
Cycling sprint power approximately tracks leg-press force

Practical Application

In elite XCO-MTB cyclists, heavy strength training through one preparatory period raised leg-press force and cycling sprint power by 16%, held through the race season, and kept climbing in later seasons (up to +44% force and +25% sprint power after 3.5 years), while two riders without strength work did not change — the case for keeping strength in the plan year after year, not for one block.
Not from this paper; the base's own practice: a strength-emphasis block of 2-3 lower-body sessions per week in the preparation period, then a maintenance dose alongside the cycling blocks rather than dropping it once intensity work starts.
Inference, not tested: the plateau in sprint power from the third to fourth preparatory period suggests the sprint transfer saturates before leg strength does.
Evidence base is a case report on very few elite cyclists; treat the magnitudes as illustrative, not expected.

Limitations

Case report: four cyclists in part one, two in part two; no statistics, no randomization.
Elite XCO-MTB men in a sport built on repeated accelerations; transfer to steady-state road or TT power was not measured.
How this entry was checked and changed
Why this level

(case report — low n, high relevance)

Content correction 2026-09-27
Removed the invented "performance gain acceleration 2-3x greater than strength or HIT alone" and "strength gains require 2+ year accumulation" bullets, and the "Wingate" label (the abstract says cycling sprint power).
"Cumulative performance adaptations exceeding either modality alone" -> the abstract's comparison: HST riders improved, the two without HST did not change.
Numbers now traced to the abstract (16%; 22/19%; 44%/25% after 3.5 years; 24/22% after 1.5 years); exercise-selection and session-frequency advice labelled as the base's own practice; Tier line rewritten as Tier 4-5 (elite XCO-MTB).
2026-09-28: added Protocol from the abstract (Europe PMC PMID 35548458).