I took 3 weeks off — how much did I lose?
Some aerobic capacity, not most of it: in trained endurance athletes who stopped completely, VO2max was about 4-7% lower after 12-21 days, about 10% after 5 weeks and 13-20% after about 8 weeks (single small studies, mostly men, not pooled). One 10-day study found no change; time to exhaustion was 9% shorter after 2 weeks; little further loss after 12 weeks.
Barbieri et al. searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Medline to July 2023 for studies of endurance athletes that reported how long training stopped or was reduced and gave pre and post values. Forty-one studies met the criteria (endurance-trained by VO2max floors or training history).
They follow Mujika and Padilla (REF-374) in splitting short-term (up to 4 weeks) from long-term (over 4 weeks) detraining, tabulate the ranges per variable (Table 1) and plot each variable against days (Figure 2).
Complete cessation lowers VO2max, mostly through lost blood and plasma volume early and a smaller arterio-venous oxygen difference later; heart rate rises, stroke volume and maximal cardiac output fall, the left ventricle gets lighter and thinner after more than 4 weeks; lactate threshold falls, muscle glycogen drops, RER rises and body mass increases beyond 4 weeks; insulin sensitivity falls within days.
Partial reduction with at least one weekly moderate-to-high intensity session maintained VO2max in the few studies that tested it. There was no quality appraisal and no meta-analysis, so every number below is a single study's result as the review reports it.
Included studies
Key Results
Complete cessation, as reported in the text (single studies; the glycogen row is reduced training)
| Variable | Time off | Change | Source study as cited |
|---|---|---|---|
| VO2max | 10 days | no change | Cullinane 1986 |
| VO2max | 12 days | −7% (runners and cyclists) | Coyle 1984 (REF-377; its abstract says −7% over the first 21 days) |
| VO2max | 14 days | −4.7% (distance runners) | Houmard 1992 |
| VO2max | 15 days | −3.7% | Chen 2022 |
| VO2max | 3 weeks | −4.18% | Martin 1986 |
| VO2max | 5 weeks | −10.1% | García-Pallarés 2009 |
| VO2max | 56 days | −13% | Coyle 1984/1985 (REF-377 reports 16% below the trained value by day 56) |
| VO2max | 2 months | −20%; no further significant fall after 12 weeks | Martin 1986 |
| Time to exhaustion | 2 weeks | −9%, running economy unchanged | Houmard 1992 |
| Blood / plasma volume | 2-4 weeks | −9% / −12% | Coyle 1986 |
| Resting plasma volume | 14 days | −5.1 ± 1.9% | Houmard 1992 |
| HRmax | short-term | +2 to 9 beats/min | several |
| Stroke volume (upright) | 10 d / 2 wk / 56 d | −0.9% / −4.1% / −14% | Doherty 2003, Chen 2022, Coyle 1984 |
| Maximal cardiac output | 5-15 d / 21 d | unchanged / −8%, no further fall | Doherty 2003, Coyle 1984 |
| Citrate synthase | 6 d / 10 d / 56 d | −5% / −28.6% / −40% | Coyle 1984, McCoy 1994 |
| GLUT4 | 6 d / 10 d | −17% / −33% (one study: unchanged at 14 d) | Vukovich 1996, McCoy 1994 |
| Muscle glycogen | 4 weeks reduced training | −18% | Madsen 1993 |
| Post-exercise lactate, same submaximal load | 84 days | 1.9 → 7.6 mmol/L | Coyle 1985 |
| RER, same absolute submaximal load | 84 days | 0.93 → 1 | Coyle 1985 |
| Capillary density | 12-84 days / 15 days | unchanged / −6% | Coyle 1984 / Houston 1979 |
| Max power (Wmax), 2 months | young 19-25 vs older 50-65 cyclists | −3.5% vs −8.8% | Giada 1998 |
Short-term (0-4 weeks) vs long-term (over 4 weeks) ranges, Table 1
| Variable | Short-term | Long-term |
|---|---|---|
| VO2max | −25.5% to +2.4% | −16% to −11.3% |
| HRmax | +1% to +5% | +1% to +1.5% |
| Qmax | −8% to +4.4% | −10% to −9% |
| Stroke volume | −12% to +3.4% | −14% to −13% |
| Left ventricular mass | −19.5% to −1.8% | "−23.8% < x < 19.5%" as printed |
| Body mass | +0.3% to +8.7% | +1.6% to +11.3% |
| a-v O2 difference | −1.3% to +2% | −7% to −4% |
| Capillary density | −6.3% to +7.1% | −5.6% to +2.6% |
| Insulin | +7% to +39% | not available |
Partial reduction (as reported): VO2max appeared maintained after 4 weeks of low-volume, moderate-to-high intensity training (Madsen 1993, McConell 1993); one weekly HIT session on reduced low-intensity volume over an 8-week transition maintained it while low-intensity training alone did not (Rønnestad 2014, see REF-166); a weekly sprint session in a 3-week transition made no significant VO2max difference against low-intensity only (Almquist 2020, see REF-165); elite kayakers lost 5.6% of VO2max after 5 weeks of reduced volume at moderate intensity (the primary abstract, REF-950, gives −4.8%); one weekly 35-min HIT session at 95% HRmax over "a more extended period" of reduction still left triathletes' time to exhaustion at 75% VO2max 21% lower (Madsen 1993).
Mechanisms
Practical Application
Limitations
How this entry was checked and changed
systematic search of four databases, but no risk-of-bias assessment, no pooling and no registered protocol; the included studies are small, mostly uncontrolled pre-post designs (the VO2max time course rests on single small studies, e.g. Coyle 1984 with 7 athletes, most from the 1980s-90s), mostly men; several numbers in the text, Table 1 and Figure 2 disagree (see Limitations); read from the full text