Best-Practice Training Characteristics Within Olympic Endurance Sports as Described by Norwegian World-Class Coaches
Participants
n=12 successful Norwegian male coaches whose athletes have won more than 380 international medals between them, spanning 8 sports: biathlon, cross-country skiing, long-distance running, rowing, road cycling, speed skating, swimming, triathlon.
Protocol
Data collected in 2022: (1) a long questionnaire sent by email covering training at the session, micro-, meso- and macro- level; (2) checking the answers against training logs that successful athletes had reported historically; (3) an in-depth, semi-structured interview with each coach in person; (4) review rounds between the authors and the coaches.
Key Results: Common Principles
1. Periodization:
2. Weekly training structure:
3. Training quality and load/recovery:
Sport-Specific Variations
Substantial differences between sports in volume, frequency, intensity distribution, and the application of strength and cross training — mainly due to exercise-mode constraints (mechanical and muscular loading), competition distance, and organizational aspects (abstract). Sport-by-sport numbers for road cycling are not in the abstract.
Practical Application
Limitations
Only Norwegian coaches (single training culture). Only male coaches. Qualitative design — coaches' descriptions, cross-referenced with logs, not measured outcomes. >380 medals is impressive, but success ≠ causation, and the authors present the findings as hypothesis-generating.
How this entry was checked and changed
regraded 2026-09-27 from A: qualitative multiple case-study of 12 coaches' practice, no outcome data, expert description rather than a trial