What helps heel pain on the first steps in the morning?
For 4-6 weeks: taping, plantar-fascia stretching and advice on shoes and load; if not better, shockwave, then custom orthoses. No runner subgroup; no tested return-to-run plan.
Morrissey and colleagues built a best-practice guide for plantar heel pain by deciding WHAT to include from a systematic review restricted to high-quality RCTs (PEDro ≥8/10, low risk of bias on a PEDro subset) and HOW and WHEN to apply it from interviews with 14 international expert clinician-researchers and a survey of 40 patients.
Of 362 trials appraised, 51 qualified (4351 participants; median sample 75); only 9 were powered (38 per group, for a 19-point change in first-step pain on a visual analogue scale) to establish efficacy, for 10 interventions. Evidence was graded strong, moderate or limited, positive or neutral, by the number of powered high-quality trials.
The resulting core approach, used together for about 4-6 weeks, is low-dye taping (moderate evidence, first-step pain at 1 week, SMD 0.47) and plantar-fascia stretching (moderate evidence of a large short-term effect against radial shockwave, SMD 1.21, mainly in acute heel pain) — both labelled "DO" — plus individualised education labelled "DECIDE": load management, pain education with pain-monitoring, attention to long-term conditions and body mass, and footwear that is supportive, comfortable, has a rearfoot-to-forefoot drop and is socially acceptable.
Education "was not tested for efficacy but was recommended by experts and appreciated by patients".
If the core approach is not working, shockwave comes next (focused: strong evidence for short-term first-step pain, OR 1.89; radial: moderate), then custom orthoses (strong evidence for short-term pain vs sham, SMD 0.41, from conflicting trials), then experimental options or a return to the core.
Prefabricated orthoses (as used in the trials), calf stretching, magnetised insoles and wheatgrass cream showed no effect; injections were inadequately tested; and the review found no high-quality trial of progressive strengthening, with the experts divided.
Our reading: for the heel row of SYNTH-73 ("heel raises are worth asking about", from one trial of 48 non-runners, REF-920) this guide puts taping, plantar-fascia stretching and education first and leaves strength training outside the proven package — not refuted, untested at the guide's quality bar.
Protocol
Key Results
Efficacy and strength of evidence (Table 1; between-group SMD or OR, 95% CI; positive favours the intervention; levels in the guide's own terms):
| Intervention (comparator) | Outcome, time | Effect | Evidence level | Place in the guide |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low-dye taping + sham ultrasound (sham ultrasound) | first-step pain, 1 week | SMD 0.47 (0.05 to 0.88) | moderate positive (one trial) | core, "DO" |
| pain; function | 0.30 (−0.11 to 0.71); −0.05 (−0.46 to 0.36) | moderate neutral | ||
| Plantar-fascia stretching (radial shockwave), mainly acute heel pain | first-step pain, short / medium / long | SMD 1.21 (0.78 to 1.63) / 0.64 (0.24 to 1.04) / −0.04 (−0.43 to 0.35) | moderate positive / moderate positive / moderate neutral (secondary proof, one trial) | core, "DO" |
| Education: load, pain (with pain-monitoring), comorbidity and body mass, footwear | — | not tested as an intervention | recommended by experts, appreciated by patients | core, "DECIDE" |
| Focused shockwave | first-step pain, short | OR 1.89 (1.18 to 3.04) | strong positive | step 2 |
| pain, short; function, short | SMD 0.36 (0.11 to 0.61); 0.36 (0.10 to 0.61) | moderate positive | ||
| first-step pain, medium / long | SMD 1.31 (0.61 to 2.01) / 1.67 (0.88 to 2.45) | limited positive (one underpowered trial) | ||
| Radial shockwave | first-step pain, short / long | OR 1.66 (1.00 to 2.76) / 1.78 (1.07 to 2.96) | moderate positive | step 2 |
| pain, short (pooled) | SMD 1.64 (−1.06 to 4.33) | "strong positive", from the two trials' own between-group statistics | ||
| Custom orthoses (sham) | pain, short / medium / long | SMD 0.41 (0.07 to 0.74) / 0.55 (0.09 to 1.02) / 0.04 (−0.37 to 0.45) | strong positive (trials conflicting) / limited positive / moderate neutral | step 3 |
| function, short | −0.21 (−0.48 to 0.06) | moderate neutral | ||
| Prefabricated orthoses | pain, short; function, short | −0.25 (−0.59 to 0.09); −0.06 (−0.40 to 0.28) | moderate neutral | not one prescription for all |
| Calf stretching | first-step pain; pain; function, short | −0.39 (−0.80 to 0.03); 0.00 (−0.40 to 0.41); −0.24 (−0.65 to 0.17) | moderate neutral | not in the guide |
| Dry needling | pain; first-step pain, short | −0.33 (−0.76 to 0.10); −0.42 (−0.85 to 0.02) | moderate neutral (the trial's own covariance analysis found a small effect) | low-priority adjunct |
| Magnetised insoles; wheatgrass cream | pain, short | 0.00 (−0.39 to 0.39); not given | moderate neutral | not in the guide |
| Progressive strengthening / resistance exercise | — | no high-quality trial found | experts divided | not in the guide |
| Corticosteroid or platelet-rich plasma injection | — | inadequately tested; no placebo- or sham-controlled RCT | — | may be considered, preferably in an RCT or with structured evaluation |
Mechanisms
Practical Application
Limitations
How this entry was checked and changed
a systematic review of quality-filtered RCTs is the rubric's A design; held at A- because only 9 RCTs (10 interventions) met the 38-per-group power rule for proof of efficacy and most graded findings rest on a single trial, 96% of trials reported short-term outcomes but only 13% long-term, certainty was not rated with GRADE, and the education, footwear, load-management and timing parts of the core approach were not tested and come from experts and patients; three authors ran trials that the review evaluated. Read from the full text (Europe PMC, CC BY 4.0)