Do I need 1% incline on the treadmill to match running outside?
Not for oxygen cost at steady speeds: pooled crossover studies put 0% and 1% within 0.6 mL/kg/min of overground (means). Heart rate and effort vary with speed. Abstract.
Miller, Van Hooren and colleagues (University of South Australia, Maastricht, Montana, Macquarie) pooled crossover studies that compared running on a treadmill with running overground in healthy adults, for physiology (VO2, heart rate, lactate), perception (RPE, preferred speed) and performance (time trials and sprints).
Thirty-four studies qualified; 12 used a 1% grade and 3 used more than 1%. At submaximal speeds on a motorised treadmill, VO2 was similar to overground at 0% (MD −0.55 ± 0.93 mL/kg/min) and at 1% grade (0.37 ± 1.12), while lactate was lower (−1.26 ± 0.71 and −0.52 ± 0.50 mmol/L).
Heart rate and RPE on the treadmill were higher at faster submaximal speeds and lower at slower ones. Near maximal effort, VO2 and lactate tended to be lower on the treadmill while heart rate (0 ± 1 bpm) and RPE (−0.4 ± 2.0 units on the 6-20 scale) were similar; at maximum, VO2 (0.78 ± 1.55) and heart rate (−1 ± 2 bpm) were similar.
Endurance performance was poorer on a motorised treadmill (SMD −0.50 ± 0.36); sprint performance varied widely and did not differ significantly (−1.4 ± 5.8 km/h). The authors conclude that some, but not all, variables differ and that the differences may depend on running speed.
Our reading: for oxygen cost the 1% grade is a convention, not a necessity — at group level both 0% and 1% sat within about half a mL/kg/min of overground running, with confidence intervals spanning zero, which agrees with the base's single study that found 1% mattering only at faster speeds (REF-733, B, n = 9).
What does not transfer is the feel and the heart rate at a given pace, and the time-trial result.
Protocol
Key Results
| Measure (treadmill minus overground) | Mean difference ± 95% CI |
|---|---|
| Submaximal VO2, 0% grade | −0.55 ± 0.93 mL/kg/min |
| Submaximal VO2, 1% grade | 0.37 ± 1.12 mL/kg/min |
| Submaximal lactate, 0% grade | −1.26 ± 0.71 mmol/L |
| Submaximal lactate, 1% grade | −0.52 ± 0.50 mmol/L |
| Submaximal heart rate and RPE | higher on the treadmill at faster submaximal speeds, lower at slower ones (no pooled number in the abstract) |
| Near-maximal VO2 | −1.25 ± 2.09 mL/kg/min |
| Near-maximal lactate | −0.54 ± 0.63 mmol/L |
| Near-maximal heart rate | 0 ± 1 bpm |
| Near-maximal RPE | −0.4 ± 2.0 units (6-20 scale) |
| Maximal VO2 | 0.78 ± 1.55 mL/kg/min |
| Maximal heart rate | −1 ± 2 bpm |
| Endurance performance (motorised treadmill) | SMD −0.50 ± 0.36 (poorer on the treadmill) |
| Sprint performance | −1.4 ± 5.8 km/h (not significant; varied considerably) |
Mechanisms
Practical Application
Limitations
How this entry was checked and changed
(from the abstract) — a registered meta-analysis of crossover studies (the rubric's A for an SR/MA of controlled trials) held at A-: the abstract gives neither the participant numbers nor heterogeneity, the comparisons mix speeds, grades and treadmill types, and the speed at which heart rate and RPE switch from lower to higher on the treadmill is not stated