REF-1589 · Liu et al., 2008 · Annals of Internal Medicine · Paper · PubMed

Pooled randomised trials in 303 young, fit people given growth hormone found 2.1 kg more lean body mass (95% CI 1.3-2.9) but no apparent gain in strength or exercise capacity, higher exercise lactate in 2 of 3 studies that measured it, and more soft-tissue swelling and fatigue, so the authors judged claims that growth hormone improves performance unsupported; from the abstract

Main caveat: Written from the abstract (no open-access copy in Europe PMC); the quality appraisal of the trials was not read.
moderate evidenceMeasured on recreational to trained athletesRead from the abstract only

Liu and colleagues pooled randomised trials that gave growth hormone or no growth hormone to healthy, physically fit people aged 13-45, to test the belief that it improves athletic performance. Forty-four articles describing 27 study samples qualified, with 303 people on growth hormone for 13.3 person-years in all.

Lean body mass rose by 2.1 kg more than without the hormone, but strength and exercise capacity did not appear to improve; exercise lactate was higher in 2 of 3 studies that measured it, and swelling and fatigue were more common.

The authors conclude that performance claims are not supported by the literature, that growth hormone may not improve strength and may worsen exercise capacity and raise adverse events, and that more research is needed.

Participants

303 participants received growth hormone; mean age 27 (SD 3) y, BMI 24 (SD 2) kg/m², VO2max 51 (SD 8) mL/kg/min; healthy, lean, physically fit, community-dwelling.

Protocol

Dose: mean 36 (SD 21) µg/kg a day.
Duration: mean 20 (SD 18) days in studies giving it for more than one day.
Comparison: no growth hormone.

Key Results

OutcomeGrowth hormone vs none
Lean body mass+2.1 kg (95% CI 1.3-2.9)
Strengthdid not seem to improve
Exercise capacitydid not seem to improve
Exercise lactatesignificantly higher in 2 of 3 studies measuring it
Soft-tissue oedema, fatiguemore frequent with growth hormone
Authors' limitations: few studies evaluated athletic performance; trial doses and regimens may not reflect real-world use.

Practical Application

Growth hormone and performance: in randomised trials in 303 young, fit adults, growth hormone added about 2 kg of lean mass but showed no gain in strength or exercise capacity and more side effects (swelling, fatigue), so the evidence does not support it as a performance drug; the GH-raising peptides sold online were not tested here.
Inference, not tested here: lean body mass by body-composition methods includes water, and swelling was more frequent, so part of the 2.1 kg may be fluid rather than working muscle.
Inference, not tested here: if giving the hormone itself showed no gain in strength or exercise capacity, a peptide sold to raise the same hormone has no shown route to a performance gain either.
Treatment in the trials lasted a mean of 20 days; long-term effects and real-world stacking with other drugs are outside this review.
How muscle is built without drugs: PHYS-21; why a hormone spike after a session does not predict gains: PHYS-33.

Limitations

Written from the abstract (no open-access copy in Europe PMC); the quality appraisal of the trials was not read.
Searches end October 2007; English only.
Short treatment periods; doses may not reflect use; few trials measured performance.
Healthy fit volunteers, not competitive athletes in a sport-specific test.
How this entry was checked and changed
Why this level

risk of bias not read (abstract only): a systematic review of RCTs, capped at B+ until its quality appraisal is read; the trials were short (mean 20 days of treatment) and few measured performance