REF-1604 · Nalbandian et al., 2017 · Sports · Paper · PubMed · Free full text

In 17 trained young men on a cycle ergometer, pedalling at 60% of lactate-threshold intensity in the 4-min recoveries between three 30-s bouts at 90% of peak power, instead of sitting, raised the peak power of a closing Wingate test by 6.6% and its mean power by 5.3%, with lower blood lactate and higher blood pH; the pH difference did not correlate with the gain. From the full text

Main caveat: One session per condition, 17 men, team-sport players rather than endurance athletes.
moderate evidenceMeasured on trained athletesRead in full

Nalbandian, Radak and Takeda (Kyoto University, University of Physical Education in Budapest, Doshisha University) asked whether active recovery between high-intensity bouts changes the performance that follows, and whether blood pH, bicarbonate and lactate explain any change.

After two weeks of familiarisation and tests of VO2max, lactate threshold and Wingate peak power, 17 men did the same session twice, a week apart and in random order: three 30-s bouts at 90% of Wingate peak power at 90 rpm, each followed by 4 min of either pedalling at 60% of lactate-threshold intensity at 60 rpm or sitting, then a Wingate test and 4 min of passive recovery.

With active recovery 15 of the 17 had a higher Wingate peak power and 16 a higher mean power. Blood lactate was lower after the second bout onward, blood pH higher, bicarbonate different at two time points, and VO2 higher throughout.

The difference in pH before the Wingate did not correlate with the difference in performance, while VO2max correlated with Wingate power in both conditions. The authors suggest that greater blood flow and faster phosphocreatine resynthesis, not pH, may explain the gain; they did not measure either.

Participants

n = 17 healthy, well-trained young men: 20.6 ± 1.9 yr, 69.3 ± 6.7 kg, 174.3 ± 5.7 cm, body fat 13.4 ± 1.6%, VO2max 59.5 ± 5.8 mL/min/kg of fat-free mass; university rugby and baseball club members with at least four years of training and at least four sessions a week; VO2max did not differ significantly by sport.

Protocol

Familiarisation: two weeks, two one-hour high-intensity sessions a week on the ergometer.
Preliminary tests: incremental test from 60 W rising 30 W every 2 min to exhaustion (above 60 rpm), breath-by-breath gas exchange, capillary lactate every 2 min (Lactate Pro 2), lactate threshold taken at the inflection of the lactate curve; on a separate day a 30-s Wingate test at a load printed as 0.75% of body weight.
Main tests: same time of day, one week apart, random order; the same meals on the preceding days and a 2-h fast; standardised warm-up; a venous catheter.
Session: 3 × 30 s at 90% of Wingate peak power at 90 rpm, each followed by 4 min of active recovery (60% of lactate-threshold intensity, 60 rpm) or sitting; then a Wingate test, started 15 s after stopping, and 4 min of passive recovery. A test was void if cadence fell below 85 rpm for 5 s.
Measures: venous pH and bicarbonate (blood gas analyser), capillary lactate before and after every bout and the Wingate and 4 min after it, breath-by-breath VO2, VCO2 and RER.
Statistics: two-factor repeated-measures ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc tests; paired t-tests for performance; Pearson correlations; significance set at p < 0.01.
Funding and interests: no conflict of interest declared; no funding statement.

Key Results

WingateActive recoveryPassive recovery
Peak power (W)715 ± 108671 ± 88 (p < 0.01)
Mean power (W), Table 1545 ± 73517 ± 70 (p < 0.01)
Mean power (W), abstract548 ± 73510 ± 70
With active recovery, peak power rose by 6.6 ± 1.4% and mean power by 5.3 ± 0.9%; 15 of 17 had a higher peak power and 16 of 17 a higher mean power. Power over the first 10 s was 7.8% higher and over the last 20 s 4% higher, neither difference significant.
Blood lactate was significantly lower with active recovery from after the second bout on (p < 0.01). In both conditions it fell during the last bouts and the Wingate (change during the Wingate −1.3 ± 2 mmol/L active, −0.3 ± 1.4 passive) and rose in the 4 min after it (5.1 ± 3.1 and 4.1 ± 3 mmol/L).
Blood pH was higher with active recovery from the second recovery onward (the figure legend says from the first); bicarbonate differed before the third bout and before the Wingate.
No significant correlation between the pH difference before the Wingate and the difference in Wingate performance; VO2max correlated significantly with Wingate peak and mean power in both trials.
Mean VO2 over the session 1782 ± 316 vs 1113 ± 102 mL/min, RER 1.23 ± 0.17 vs 1.36 ± 0.09 (active vs passive).

Practical Application

Between short hard bouts, easy pedalling beat sitting for the all-out effort that followed: in 17 trained young team-sport men, spinning at 60% of lactate-threshold power in 4-min recoveries raised a closing Wingate's peak power by 6.6% and mean power by 5.3%. The gain did not track the pH difference, so this is a reason to keep moving easily, not a reason to wait for a lactate number.
Inference, not tested here: after a short test before intervals, a few minutes of easy pedalling rather than stopping fits this result and the base's practice of 3-5 min easy after an SFT (SYNTH-66).
The format matters: in pooled interval studies active recovery added no time near VO2max, and in exhaustive running protocols passive recovery allowed more work (REF-1363); here the bouts were 30 s, the rests 4 min and the outcome one maximal sprint.
"Easy" here means easy: 60% of lactate-threshold power at 60 rpm.
The mechanism the authors propose (blood flow, phosphocreatine) is their hypothesis; in REF-480, power recovery after a 30-s sprint tracked phosphocreatine, not muscle pH.

Limitations

One session per condition, 17 men, team-sport players rather than endurance athletes.
Not blinded; the order was randomised but its effect was not tested.
The abstract and Table 1 disagree on mean power (548 vs 510 W against 545 vs 517 W).
Only the pH difference was tested against performance; lactate was not.
The Wingate load is printed as 0.75% of body weight.
The authors note that muscle pH and muscle lactate were not measured.
No funding statement.
How this entry was checked and changed
Why this level

a crossover with 15 or more participants (n = 17) on a performance outcome, read in full; not lowered for the mismatch in mean power between the abstract (548 vs 510 W) and Table 1 (545 vs 517 W), since both show the same direction and significance; one session, no blinding