REF-1667 · Chen et al., 2026 · Journal of Sport and Health Science, article · Paper · PubMed

Training in the heat beat the same kind of training in thermoneutral conditions for aerobic performance in the heat (Hedges' g 0.56) and for heat adaptation

Larger falls in resting and exercise core temperature (g 0.51 and 0.55) and exercise heart rate (g 0.69), a larger rise in sweat rate (g 0.56), skin temperature not significantly different (g 0.47) — in a multilevel meta-analysis of 23 studies; the extra benefit was larger in Tier 3 athletes and longer interventions, and thermoneutral training alone also lowered exercise core temperature and heart rate

Main caveat: The authors': the within-group analyses are exploratory.
moderate evidenceMeasured on non-athletes to highly trained athletesRead from the abstract only

Chen and colleagues asked whether exercising in hot conditions adds anything to heat resilience beyond the same exercise in thermoneutral conditions, since some evidence suggests that thermoneutral training brings comparable adaptations.

They searched five databases to November 2025, included 23 studies, and used multilevel meta-analysis to estimate differences between hot and thermoneutral training groups and changes from baseline within each.

Compared with thermoneutral training, heat training produced larger falls in resting and exercise core temperature and exercise heart rate, a larger rise in sweat rate, and a larger gain in aerobic performance in the heat; exercise skin temperature did not differ significantly.

Against baseline, heat training improved every heat-related outcome by a moderate to large amount, while thermoneutral training significantly improved exercise core temperature and exercise heart rate. The added benefit of heat was larger in elite athletes (the authors' Tier 3) and in longer interventions; no other moderator was significant.

The authors conclude that heat exposure during training gives extra heat adaptation and aerobic performance in the heat, and that thermoneutral training still produces modest gains in key thermoregulatory and cardiovascular outcomes.

Participants

23 studies; the number of participants, sex split, age and sports are not in the abstract.
Training status was a moderator; one subgroup is labelled "elite athletes (Tier 3)"; the other categories are not named in the abstract.

Protocol

Search: PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, to 20 November 2025.
Comparison: exercise in hot conditions vs exercise in thermoneutral conditions (between-group); each condition vs its own baseline (within-group, exploratory).
Outcomes: resting and exercise core temperature, exercise heart rate, exercise skin temperature, sweat rate, aerobic performance in the heat.
Analysis: Hedges' g, multilevel meta-analysis; subgroup analyses of moderators such as training status, intervention duration and type of performance outcome.
Not in the abstract: study designs (randomised or not), whether the two conditions matched absolute or relative intensity, heat temperatures and humidity, number and length of sessions, intervention durations and the cut-off for "longer", confidence intervals, heterogeneity, risk of bias.

Key Results

OutcomeHeat vs thermoneutral training (Hedges' g)Significant
Resting core temperature (reduction)0.51yes
Exercise core temperature (reduction)0.55yes
Exercise heart rate (reduction)0.69yes
Sweat rate (increase)0.56yes
Aerobic performance in the heat0.56yes
Exercise skin temperature0.47no
Within-group change from baselineResult
Heat trainingmoderate-to-large improvements in all heat-related outcomes (values not in the abstract)
Thermoneutral training, exercise core temperatureg 0.41, significant
Thermoneutral training, exercise heart rateg 0.57, significant
Thermoneutral training, other outcomesnot reported as significant in the abstract
Moderators: the extra benefit of heat was more pronounced in elite athletes (Tier 3) and with longer intervention periods; all other moderators p > 0.05. The sizes of these subgroup effects are not in the abstract.

Practical Application

Before a hot race, train in the heat rather than relying on normal training: across 23 studies, heat training added a moderate gain in aerobic performance in the heat (g 0.56) and larger heat adaptations than the same training in thermoneutral conditions; the protocol to use is in SYNTH-04.
Normal training is not worthless for the heat: thermoneutral training alone lowered exercise core temperature (g 0.41) and exercise heart rate (g 0.57) from baseline, so a fit athlete without heat access starts partly prepared — but the abstract reports no significant within-group sweat-rate gain for it, and heat training added more aerobic performance in the heat.
In elite (Tier 3) athletes the heat added more: the extra benefit was larger in the authors' Tier 3 athletes and in longer interventions (SYNTH-22: answer by who was measured); the abstract does not say how long "longer" is, so the base's dose (8 ± 4 exposures of 90 ± 36 min, SYNTH-04) stays as it is.
Not settled by this design: whether heat training beats thermoneutral training for performance in cool conditions (not an outcome here; SYNTH-06 weighs heat against altitude for a temperate target), how much heat per session, and whether the groups trained at the same relative intensity.

Limitations

The authors': the within-group analyses are exploratory.
Whether the training-status moderator uses McKay tiers throughout is not stated beyond the "Tier 3" label.
Written from the abstract and the PubMed record; full text not read: risk of bias, study designs, participant numbers and characteristics, heat protocols, intensity matching, confidence intervals, heterogeneity and the size of the moderator effects are unknown.
How this entry was checked and changed
Why this level

risk of bias not read (abstract only); a meta-analysis whose abstract reports no quality or certainty appraisal; the performance result is an outcome, while the core-temperature, heart-rate, skin-temperature and sweat-rate results are markers and would sit one step lower on their own