REF-1693 · Chen, Tu & Wang, 2026 · Nutrients, · Paper · PubMed

Caffeine plus sodium bicarbonate against placebo raised mean power by 8.43 W (95% CI 1.85 to 15.00) and cut time-trial time by about 1.6% (ratio of means 0.984, 0.970 to 0.998) in a meta-analysis of 13 crossover trials, but both results lost significance when single studies were left out, and the pair gave no significant mean-power gain over caffeine or bicarbonate alone; gut tolerance and perceived exertion showed no consistent effect (narrative synthesis)

Main caveat: The authors' own: both performance gains over placebo depend on individual studies (leave-one-out).
moderate evidenceMeasured on non-athletes to trained athletesRead from the abstract only

Chen, Tu and Wang asked whether taking caffeine and sodium bicarbonate together gives more than either alone, and what the pair does to blood buffering, lactate, perceived exertion and gut comfort.

They searched three databases up to 18 July 2026 and pooled 13 crossover trials with random-effects models, allowing for the within-person design of crossovers and testing robustness by leaving out one study at a time and by trying other correlation values.

Against placebo the combination raised mean power by about 8 W and shortened time-trial completion time by an estimated 1.6%, but each result stopped being significant when certain single studies were removed, which the authors read as limited robustness. Against caffeine alone or bicarbonate alone the combination did not significantly raise mean power.

Blood bicarbonate and post-exercise lactate rose against placebo, the bicarbonate result resting on heterogeneous or few studies. Narratively, the trials showed no consistent effect on perceived exertion or gut tolerance.

The authors conclude that the combination may give modest gains over placebo whose significance hangs on single studies, that an added benefit over either supplement alone is not established, and that its gut tolerability remains uncertain.

Participants

13 crossover trials; total participants, sex, age, sport and training level are not in the abstract.

Protocol

Search: PubMed, Web of Science and SPORTDiscus, inception to 18 July 2026.
Comparisons: CAF + SB against placebo, against caffeine alone and against sodium bicarbonate alone.
Outcomes: exercise performance (mean power, time-trial completion time), blood HCO3-, post-exercise lactate, RPE and gastrointestinal symptoms.
Analysis: random-effects pooling of mean differences (MD) or ratios of means (RoM) with 95% CIs; within-participant correlation accounted for; leave-one-out and alternative correlation coefficients as sensitivity analyses; RPE and gut symptoms synthesised narratively, not pooled.
Not in the abstract: doses and timing of caffeine and bicarbonate, exercise tasks and durations, the risk-of-bias tool and its result, heterogeneity values for the performance outcomes, registration and funding.

Key Results

OutcomeComparisonResultp
Mean powerCAF + SB vs placeboMD +8.43 W (95% CI 1.85 to 15.00)0.012
Time-trial completion timeCAF + SB vs placeboRoM 0.984 (0.970 to 0.998), an estimated 1.6% reduction0.022
Mean powerCAF + SB vs caffeine alonenot significant (estimate not in the abstract)not given
Mean powerCAF + SB vs bicarbonate alonenot significant (estimate not in the abstract)not given
Blood HCO3-CAF + SB vs placeboincreased; evidence limited by heterogeneity or few studiesnot given
Post-exercise lactateCAF + SB vs placeboincreasednot given
RPEnarrativeno consistent effectnot pooled
Gastrointestinal symptomsnarrativeno consistent effect; tolerability uncertainnot pooled
Both placebo-comparison performance results were sensitive to excluding individual studies in the leave-one-out analyses.
The numbers of studies behind each comparison are not in the abstract.

Practical Application

Taking caffeine and bicarbonate together is not shown to beat taking caffeine alone or bicarbonate alone. Against placebo the pair gave about 8 W more mean power and a time trial about 1.6% faster across 13 crossover trials, but both results hung on single studies, and against either supplement alone there was no significant gain in mean power.
This agrees with [SYNTH-67]'s Combinations section, which calls caffeine with bicarbonate unclear (REF-354) and records no added gain in one 3-km time trial (REF-1621); the guide's rule to add one supplement at a time so the response can be attributed is unchanged by this paper.
Inference, not tested here: an athlete who already uses caffeine and races in bicarbonate's 30 s-12 min window (REF-354) gains no evidence-based reason from this review to stack the two; if both are trialled, trial them separately first, because the combination's gut tolerance was not shown to be acceptable or unacceptable.
Higher blood bicarbonate and lactate are markers, not performance: the authors themselves say these responses do not show better performance on their own.

Limitations

The authors' own: both performance gains over placebo depend on individual studies (leave-one-out); the blood bicarbonate result rests on heterogeneous or few studies; RPE and gut symptoms could only be summarised narratively.
Unknown from the abstract: the risk of bias of the 13 trials, their sizes, doses, timing, exercise durations and populations, the heterogeneity of the performance outcomes, and the point estimates for the comparisons with caffeine or bicarbonate alone.
A non-significant difference against caffeine or bicarbonate alone is not proof that the combination adds nothing; the abstract gives no interval for those comparisons.
Written from the abstract and the PubMed record; full text not read.
How this entry was checked and changed
Why this level

a meta-analysis of crossover trials whose abstract does not report its risk-of-bias or certainty assessment: risk of bias not read (abstract only); the performance results are also fragile on the authors' own leave-one-out analysis