REF-830 · Giandolini et al., 2016 · European Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. · Paper · PubMed

Fatigue associated with prolonged graded running

B+moderate evidenceMeasured on a mixed groupWritten before October 2026, being re-checked

Most running research concerns level running, but the size and cause of fatigue depend on the predominant type of muscle contraction, which differs between level, uphill and downhill running.

Comparing prolonged hilly running (uphill plus downhill) with level running, the review finds the general shape of the neuromuscular fatigue-duration curve, the causes of fatigue in the knee extensors and plantar flexors, and the biomechanical consequences to be similar — suggesting that duration, more than elevation change, drives the loss of neuromuscular function and change in running pattern.

"Pure" uphill or downhill running, however, has its own features.

Downhill running causes severe lower-limb tissue damage, seen indirectly in massive rises of plasma creatine kinase/myoglobin and inflammatory markers, and systematically produces low-frequency fatigue (excitation-contraction coupling failure), attributed to mechanical stress at the sarcoplasmic reticulum/T-tubule interface.

Low-frequency fatigue also appears after high-intensity uphill running, where inorganic phosphate accumulation probably plays the central role. Strategies to limit the harmful effects of downhill running, energy cost versus heat storage, and muscle-activity changes across gradients are also discussed.

Participants

Not applicable (review). The abstract does not give the number of studies reviewed.

Protocol

Narrative review of neurophysiological and biomechanical changes due to fatigue in graded running.
Compares prolonged hilly running with level running, and "pure" uphill and downhill running with level running.
No search strategy or pooling described in the abstract.

Key Results

Prolonged hilly vs level running: similar shape of the neuromuscular fatigue-duration curve, similar causes of fatigue in knee extensors and plantar flexors, comparable biomechanical consequences; duration rather than elevation change appears to drive fatigue.
Downhill running: severe lower-limb tissue damage (massive increases in plasma creatine kinase/myoglobin or inflammatory markers) and systematic low-frequency fatigue, attributed to mechanical stress at the sarcoplasmic reticulum/T-tubule interface.
Intense uphill running: low-frequency fatigue also found, probably through inorganic phosphate accumulation.
The abstract gives no numerical values.

Practical Application

This narrative review of fatigue in graded running concludes that over long efforts a hilly run tires the legs much like a flat one of the same duration, but pure descents are different: downhill running causes severe muscle damage and a specific low-frequency fatigue from mechanical stress, while hard climbing produces low-frequency fatigue through metabolic by-products. Plan a trail block around duration first, and treat long or steep descents as a separate, damaging load that the legs must be prepared for.
Downhill damage shows up as large rises in creatine kinase and myoglobin. Inference, not tested here: the day or two after a big descent-heavy session should be easy, because the legs' force has not come back even when breathing and heart rate feel normal.
Not from this paper; the base's own practice: build descent tolerance with repeated, gradually longer downhill running before a mountain race (REF-660, REF-782); the review's own strategies to limit downhill damage are not detailed in the abstract.

Limitations

Narrative review; study selection is not described.
Mechanisms are drawn largely from laboratory protocols (treadmill uphill and downhill running) that may differ from real trail terrain.
No doses, thresholds or effect sizes in the abstract.
Written from the abstract and record metadata only (full text not read).
How this entry was checked and changed
Why this level

authoritative narrative review from the leading graded-running fatigue group (Millet, Morin, Vernillo); no systematic method