SYNTH-63 · Guide

Ultra-distance cycling (over ~6 h, 12/24-h time trials, multi-day and bikepacking)

Ride far below fresh thresholds and let the ceiling fall with the hours, eat by the clock because appetite fails in the back half, protect sleep in multi-day races, and cut stopped time before riding harder

B-limited, mixed evidenceMostly from recreational to highly trained athletesWritten before October 2026, being re-checked

The question it answers

A rider is preparing for a single effort longer than ~6 h, a 12-h or 24-h time trial, a multi-day race or a bikepacking event: how hard to ride as the hours pass, what to eat and drink when appetite fades, how to sleep and how to train. A 100-mile TT (~3.5-5 h for most amateurs) belongs to the 3-6 h rows of SYNTH-50 and SYNTH-02; this card starts where they stop. Durability physiology is SYNTH-32; the taper is SYNTH-34.

Default (what to prescribe first)

1

Intensity: far below fresh thresholds, falling with the hours. In 10 elite men racing 525 km with 12 600 m of climbing (27 h 25 min on average), heart rate averaged 0.68 of HRmax, 78% of the race was below 80% of HRmax and 3% above 90%, and the ratio fell from 0.86 at the start to 0.66 at the end; the authors describe a fall of about 10% every 10 hours (REF-797, B, HR only, no power).

In the lab, trained cyclists lost 5% of power at the first threshold after 139 ± 78 min, on an accelerating curve (REF-143, B, n=12).

Not from a study; the base's own practice: ride steady terrain below rested VT1 power from the start, keep climbs clearly short of threshold, lower both caps as the hours pass, and pace late hours by perceived effort and power, not by a heart-rate target set in the first hours.

2

Start slower than you feel you can. Optimal pacing beyond 4 h is not established (REF-010, B+, 2008 narrative review). Transfer from running: in 501 runners over 5 editions of a 24-h race, better performers started slower relative to their own 24-h average (r = −.58), while the last 2 h did not separate results (r = .03) (REF-778, B+, observational).

In four editions of a 24-h cycling race, rank grew more predictive as the race went on, but mid-field solo riders' standings stayed least settled (REF-857, B, ranks only): early position says little.

3

Cut stopped time before riding harder. Transfer from running: in 15 runners over a 106 km mountain ultra, faster finishers were the ones who stopped less (r = −.772) (REF-664, B).

4

Eat by the clock, not by appetite, and plan the back half. In 14 well-trained riders on a 1,230 km non-stop ride (42:47 h), carbohydrate averaged 57.1 g/h and fluid 392 ml/h, both fell significantly after km 618, and 12 of 14 ate less than they spent (REF-799, B). Not from a study; the base's own practice: start an ultra plan at 60-80 g/h and let rehearsal set the ceiling (SYNTH-02).

5

Multi-day: do not cut sleep to gain time. In 23 Race Across France riders, more sleep per 24 h went with a higher ranking, and less sleep with worse cognition and slower responses (REF-796, B, correlational).

Decision (who → what)

The middle column is house practice; the right column is what the entries show.

SituationWhat changes (practice)Source and how sure
6-12 h single effort, 12-h TTBelow-VT1 pacing from the start; 60-80 g/h, set by rehearsal; food as well as drinksREF-143 B (lab, trained cyclists); SYNTH-02 ultra note (practice); single-stage ultra-running stand: 150-400 kcal/h, carbohydrate 30-50 g/h, protein 5-10 g/h (REF-528, A, running)
24-h TT or non-stop ride of 1-2 daysAs above, plus a written plan for the back half and for the nightIntake fell after km 618 (REF-799, B); in 8 men on a 24-h relay, weighed intake was 22.8 MJ (943 g carbohydrate) against ~42.9 MJ estimated expenditure, and intake did not track distance (REF-855, B, expenditure from HR); heart rate fell ~10% per 10 h (REF-797, B, elite men); sleep-loss harm grew ~0.4% per hour awake (REF-204, A-, lab, 89% men); caffeine late in the race, particularly when sleep loss threatens safety (REF-528, A, running)
Multi-day race with sleep stopsPlanned sleep blocks; expect an energy deficit; recovery food at every stopREF-796 B, correlational; a four-rider RAAM relay team spent 6,420 kcal a day and took in 4,918 (REF-798, C+, case study); the UCI puts extreme racing (>6-h races, stage events) at 10-25 g/kg/day carbohydrate (REF-748, A, elite riders)
Multi-day MTB marathon stage racePrepare repeated hard days, not only long easy volume7 amateurs in an 8-day stage race averaged 79.2% of lab HRmax, with 36% of race time in the two highest lactate-anchored HR zones (REF-859, B, HR only)
Self-supported bikepackingSame pacing and sleep logic; food logistics decide intakeNo entry studies self-supported riding; the UCI statement names translation to self-supported amateurs as an open question (REF-748)
Rider with a history of gut troubleLonger gut rehearsal, more solid-food varietyIn 221 endurance athletes, GI symptoms tracked a history of GI distress (r = 0.37 and 0.51); in a 100/150-km cycling race mean intake was 53 g/h and 4% had serious symptoms (REF-787, B+, self-report)
Hot eventHeat acclimation beforehand; pace by RPE; expect to burn less of what you drinkAt 32 °C vs 19 °C, exogenous glucose oxidation fell 14-15% and a TT after 2 h was 15% slower (REF-461, B, n=10 trained men); >2% body-mass loss usually costs performance in warm-hot conditions (REF-062, B+); protocol SYNTH-04
Cold nightsClothing and food, not a drinking targetHypohydration did not impair submaximal aerobic performance in the cold (REF-062); cold habituation develops over several exposures but is weaker and slower than heat adaptation, with little performance data (REF-562, B+)

How to progress / periodise

Not from a study; the base's own practice for every number in this section unless a refId is attached:

Build the long ride first, then add back-to-back long days.In 600 km racers, longer training sessions went with faster times (REF-854, B) while 3-month logged volume did not track race speed (r² = .000; anthropometry r² = .178) (REF-858, B, 28 men, correlational). SYNTH-32's matrix (practice) puts marathon MTB or ultra at two long rides a week in peak preparation, some of 6 h or more.Keep the long ride one ride (inference; the study was a 60-min moderate-intensity running interval session and its entry says it does not apply to long low-intensity work): in 14 well-trained male runners, one continuous session drifted (HR 168 → 173 bpm, RPE 13.4 → 14.8) while the same work split 6.5 h apart reset; acute responses only (REF-159, B).
Hard days alternate with easy ones in training. One Giro podium finisher never did more than 2 consecutive days with significant medium/high intensity or load in training; only racing broke that (REF-080, C+, n=1, Tier 5). House practice: back-to-back long days are a race rehearsal every 3-4 weeks, not the weekly pattern.
Recovery between consecutive long days: when the next hard session is under ~6 h away, make ~40% of recovery carbohydrate fructose-containing (REF-734, B+, n=8, running lab crossover; a 4-h recovery was tested, the ~6 h trigger is the entry's practice line, overnight recovery not studied); the UCI dose between two race days is 1-1.2 g/kg/h carbohydrate early and 0.3-0.4 g/kg protein (REF-748).
Every long ride is a fuelling rehearsal on the SYNTH-02 ladder, including real food and the late-ride foods that still go down; the ultra-running stand calls for an individualised, periodised, food-first strategy (REF-528).
Rehearse the night: at least one long ride into the dark and one planned short sleep stop before a multi-day event (house practice; no entry tests it).
Keep the gym (SYNTH-43) and taper by SYNTH-34 §5; that taper is written for 4-6 h events, so its extension to ultras is practice too.
After the event: after a 166 km mountain running ultra, leg force was back by 16 days, mostly within 9 (REF-662, B, running). Inference: cycling has far less eccentric loading, so the cycling timeline is probably shorter, but no entry measures it. Two days after an ultra, runners showed lower submaximal heart rate with higher RPE, which was fatigue, not fitness (REF-757, B-).

Sleep strategy (multi-day events)

Evidence: in REF-796 (B, n=23, wrist actigraphy), riders averaging under 5.29 h a day were sleepier. The entry says 5.29 h is where the comparison was split, not a tested minimum: do not give it to a rider as a target. The authors recommend timing sleep with the homeostatic and circadian drives; they did not test a plan.Across 69 lab studies, total deprivation and waking early harmed performance, going to bed later did not consistently harm it, and afternoon/evening tasks suffered most (REF-204, A-).
Default (inference from [REF-796] and [REF-204], not tested): put the main sleep in the night hours, in one block rather than scattered naps, and ride the early morning after it. Naps of 20-90 min with 30 min to clear sleep inertia come from a review of athletes' daytime napping, not from ultras (REF-608, B).
Around 24 h: in 67 recreational men racing 600 km, the 31 finishers who napped took 1,934 min vs 1,567 min for the 23 who rode through, but sleep did not stay in the multivariate model, and slower riders may simply have needed it (REF-854, B). Not from a study; the base's own practice: a rider racing for time rides through, a dangerously sleepy one stops; start rested and plan caffeine for the night (REF-528).

When NOT to use it / red flags

Hallucinations or disorientation = stop and assess, not grit: at UTMB, sleep loss plus effort slowed responses and in some runners produced visual hallucinations (REF-665, B, running). House practice: treat micro-sleeps the same way; on open roads a sleep stop is a safety decision.
Do not chase a heart-rate target from the first hours (REF-797; the entry's inference, HR only); a falling HR late is the normal pattern, not spare capacity.
Do not prescribe 120 g/h for an ultra. SYNTH-02 says the 120 g/h ceiling does not apply beyond 6 h; the ultra-running review calls ~90 g/h's tolerability in competition "questionable" (REF-663, B+).
Do not drink to a high fixed schedule of plain water. The international consensus puts exercise-associated hyponatraemia, and all known deaths from it, down to drinking more than is lost, and recommends drinking to thirst (REF-776, A-, mostly observational data).Both hypohydration and hyponatraemia occur in ultras, and drinking to thirst generally maintains euhydration (REF-663, running). A sodium model found targeted sodium necessary only with >80% of fluid losses replaced and sweat sodium ≥40 mmol/L (REF-223, C, model, running ultra scenario).
Do not quote the RAAM numbers as a solo rider's day: they come from one relay team (REF-798). Expect weight loss in multi-day ultras and treat it as an absorption limit, not a failure of discipline (SYNTH-24, B).
No ibuprofen during the event. In a randomised trial of 89 ultrarunners over 80 km, ibuprofen 400 mg every 4 h was followed by acute kidney injury in 52% vs 34% on placebo (number needed to harm 5.5; CI crossed zero) (REF-892, A-, running, desert; transfer).
Hand numbness or weakness that persists after riding → a clinician. After a 6-day, 420-mile tour, 14 riders' deep ulnar motor branch conducted more slowly, and carpal tunnel syndrome worsened in 3 hands and began in 1 (REF-890, B, no control).
House rule: fever or its company (chills, aches, malaise), a chesty cough, breathlessness out of proportion or vomiting end the ride; chest pain, palpitations or dizziness end it and mean a doctor. A head cold with no fever allows easy and short riding only, which an ultra-distance day is not (SYNTH-36).

What the evidence does and does not show

Shows (cycling, observational): intensity by heart rate falls through a day-long race in elite men (REF-797); self-chosen intake falls after halfway and falls short of expenditure (REF-799); a supported relay team ran a daily deficit (REF-798); more sleep per 24 h went with a better ranking and better cognition (REF-796); in one 24-h race the fastest age group was 35-39 and the winners' sex gap 19.7% (REF-856, B, results only).Sustained expenditure is capped by absorption (SYNTH-24).
Does not show: power decline beyond ~4 h (the lab studies REF-143, REF-179 stop at 2-4 h); a tested pacing, fuelling or sleep plan; whether sleeping more causes a better finish (fitter riders may do both); women (sex is not reported in three studies and REF-797 is men only); training for ultras.Stoppage and 24-h pacing come from running (REF-664, REF-778); the flush model, in which ultra pace follows perceived effort held below a security reserve, is a proposal the review did not test (REF-777, B+, running).

Evidence gaps

Power decline over 12-48 h of real cycling, and a sustainable fraction of threshold for 12-h and 24-h TTs.
Sleep interventions in ultracycling: only self-chosen naps vs race time (REF-854) and sleep vs ranking (REF-796); no tested plan.
Solo 24-h nutrition and power pacing: only relay intake (REF-855), rank dynamics (REF-857) and results by age and sex (REF-856).
Contact points: saddle, hands, neck. A lab hand-numbness method (REF-248, C, n=10 men) and nerve changes after a 6-day tour (REF-890, B), no tested countermeasure; contact-point advice is house practice.
Self-supported bikepacking logistics, multi-day recovery in cyclists, training studies for ultras, cold-weather cycling performance, female ultracyclists.
How this entry was checked and changed
Why this level

(cycling-specific evidence is observational field studies, B and two C+, n=1-67; sleep-loss and ultra-running nutrition rest on A-/A reviews from other settings; the training build, pacing caps and sleep plan rest on no ultra-cycling trial)

Content correction 2026-09-27
Revision 2026-09-29: CHANGED 'Under ~24 h' sleep line (was practice only) to 'Around 24 h' with REF-854 (Knechtle 2012, B: 600 km nappers slower, sleep not in the multivariate model); added REF-855 (24-h relay intake ~half of expenditure), REF-857 (24-h ranks unsettled mid-field, supports 'start slower'), REF-856 (24-h age and sex), REF-858 (logged volume did not track 600 km speed), REF-859 (MTB stage race) and red flags REF-892 (A-, ibuprofen → AKI, running) and REF-890 (B, ulnar nerve after a 6-day tour).Gaps narrowed; level unchanged (B-).
2026-10-01: cross-reference repointed from a merged framework to the one that replaced it (SYNTH-01→31, 05→34, 09→70, 12/15→32, 19→26).
Verification 2026-10-01: all 36 cited REF entries opened in the live snapshot; every level/design/n next to a refId matches the head block and every number (REF-797 HR ratios, REF-799 intake, REF-855 MJ, REF-798 kcal, REF-854 minutes, REF-858 r², REF-787, REF-204, REF-892, REF-890, REF-856) matches the entry.Running-to-cycling transfers (REF-778, REF-664, REF-662, REF-665, REF-892, REF-528, REF-663) are labelled as transfer/running in place. Level B- is honest: no Default or Decision row is pure evidence for the prescription; the card says the middle column is house practice.Main defect is stale pointers to merged frameworks (SYNTH-12, SYNTH-05), one of which quotes text that no longer exists.
2026-10-01: level tags next to cited frameworks updated to their current levels after the independent audit.
2026-10-01: the illness line now carries the house rule in full (fever or its company = stop; above the neck and no fever = easy and short only; chest pain, palpitations, dizziness = a doctor), consistent with SYNTH-36 and SYNTH-30.