PHYS-19 · Principle

Will my running or riding hurt my strength gains?

A little, mostly for explosive power: in meta-analyses maximal strength and muscle size were largely spared, and the power loss sat mostly in same-session designs.

How the body works, agreed across the reviews below; a study entry shows what one experiment measured.

well supported, with open questions namedApplies to anyone who lifts and trains enduranceWell supported — a small blunting of power gains in adults (meta-analyses from different groups: REF-512, 21 studies; REF-330, 43 studies; in youth concurrent training raised power more than strength training alone…

Practical Application

Will my running or riding hurt my strength gains? A little, mostly for explosive power: in meta-analyses maximal strength and muscle size were largely spared, and the power loss sat mostly in same-session designs.
What it means for training: when power or strength is the goal, keep key lifts apart from long or hard endurance work and lift first when they must share a session (spacing: SYNTH-31; order: REF-588).
What it does not mean: that lifting costs endurance (it improved economy and time trials in trained endurance athletes, REF-071; aerobic gains matched endurance-only training across 17 meta-analyses, Held et al. 2026), or that cycling is safe and running not (modality mattered in REF-512, not in REF-330).

Mechanism

In 21 studies, adding endurance work lowered pooled gains in size, strength and power, power alone significantly below strength-only; running and more frequent or longer endurance sessions went with more interference (REF-512).
In 43 trials of healthy untrained-to-active adults, maximal strength (SMD −0.06) and hypertrophy (−0.01) were not compromised and explosive strength was (−0.28), mostly in same-session designs (REF-330).
Narrower costs elsewhere: lower-body 1RM in trained, not untrained, people (ES −0.35, 27 studies, Petré et al. 2021); lower-body strength in men (−0.43), not women (59 studies, Huiberts et al. 2024); fibre size (SMD −0.23; type I fibres with running, not cycling; Lundberg et al. 2022).
Endurance signalling can inhibit protein-synthesis pathways in theory (REF-511), yet acute concurrent exercise has not shown such molecular interference in humans (Fyfe, Bishop & Stepto 2014); data in highly trained athletes are scarce (Held et al. 2026).

Common misreading

"Cardio kills gains"; "lifting makes an endurance athlete slow"; "cycling causes no interference".

Backs

SYNTH-21 "Interference exists, and it is smaller and narrower than the folklore." · SYNTH-21 "Do not talk an endurance athlete out of strength work on interference grounds." · SYNTH-31 "endurance-exercise AMPK activation can inhibit mTOR signalling to the protein-synthesis machinery" (proposed, not shown in humans after acute exercise)

Sources

Wilson et al. 2012 REF-512 (A) · Paper ↗
Schumann et al. 2022 REF-330 (A) · Paper ↗
Fyfe, Bishop & Stepto 2014 · Paper ↗
Petré et al. 2021 · Paper ↗
Huiberts et al. 2024 · Paper ↗
Lundberg et al. 2022 · Paper ↗
Held et al. 2026 · Paper ↗
Gäbler et al. 2018 · Paper ↗
REF-588 (A)
REF-511 (C+)
REF-071 (A)