Fructose (or Galactose) Added to Maltodextrin Doubles Post-Exercise Liver Glycogen Synthesis vs Glucose
Participants
n=10 well-trained male cyclists; three experimental sessions at least 1 week apart. After a standard exercise protocol to exhaustion, subjects drank one of three 15% carbohydrate solutions — FRU (maltodextrin + fructose, 2:1), GAL (maltodextrin + galactose, 2:1) or GLU (maltodextrin + glucose, 2:1) — each delivering 69 g CHO/h over 6.5 h of recovery. Liver glycogen was followed by ¹³C magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
Overview
Décombaz et al. compared how three maltodextrin-based drinks restore liver glycogen after exhaustive exercise. Liver glycogen concentration rose faster with FRU (24 ± 2 mmol·L⁻¹·h⁻¹, P < 0.001) and GAL (28 ± 3, P < 0.001) than with GLU (13 ± 2). Liver volume increased with FRU (9 ± 2%) and GAL (10 ± 2%) but not GLU (2 ± 1%, NS).
Net glycogen synthesis was linear and faster with FRU (8.1 ± 0.6 g/h, P < 0.001) and GAL (8.6 ± 0.9 g/h, P < 0.001) than with GLU (3.7 ± 0.5 g/h).
Conclusion: when ingested at a rate designed to saturate intestinal CHO transport, maltodextrin drinks with added fructose or galactose were twice as effective as maltodextrin + glucose at restoring liver glycogen in short-term post-exercise recovery. Muscle glycogen was not the outcome of this study.
Protocol
Key Findings
Practical Application
Limitations
How this entry was checked and changed
regraded 2026-09-27 from B+: crossover, n=10