REF-1345 · Cheung, Hume & Maxwell, 2003 · Sports Medicine · Paper · PubMed

Why do my legs hurt most after a new or downhill session?

Unaccustomed, mostly eccentric work brings delayed soreness; this 2003 review lists six proposed causes, expects several together and advises 1-2 easier days (C+, abstract).

Main caveat: Read from the abstract only. The included studies, their populations, designs and results could not be checked; the abstract carries no numbers.
thin evidenceMeasured on non-athletes to trained athletes

Cheung, Hume and Maxwell reviewed what was known by 2003 about delayed-onset muscle soreness: why it happens, how it affects performance and what treats it.

In their account DOMS ranges from tenderness to severe pain, is most frequent when athletes return to training after a lay-off at the start of a season or meet a new kind of activity at any time of year, and follows eccentric work more often and more severely than other muscle actions, with intensity and duration also mattering.

They list up to six proposed explanations — lactic acid, muscle spasm, connective-tissue damage, muscle damage, inflammation and enzyme efflux — and judge that a combination of two or more is the likely answer.

DOMS, they write, reduces joint range of motion, shock attenuation and peak torque, and may change muscle sequencing and recruitment so that ligaments and tendons take unaccustomed stress, raising injury risk if an athlete returns too early.

On treatment: anti-inflammatory drugs showed dose-dependent effects that may depend on timing; massage gave mixed results depending on timing and technique; cryotherapy, stretching, homeopathy, ultrasound and electrical current showed no effect on soreness; exercise relieved the pain best, but only temporarily.

Their advice: after intense DOMS-inducing exercise, cut intensity and duration for one to two days or train less affected body parts, and introduce eccentric or novel exercise progressively over one or two weeks.

Our reading: a sound general picture of when DOMS appears and why its cause is unsettled, but the treatment verdicts are dated — later meta-analyses in the base found cold-water immersion, cryotherapy and above all massage reduced DOMS (REF-385, A; REF-250, A), while stretching did not (REF-385) — and the abstract gives no time course in hours or days; that comes from REF-1347.

Protocol

Design: narrative review; the abstract gives no search strategy, databases, number of studies or inclusion criteria.
Scope (abstract): incidence and triggers of DOMS; proposed mechanisms; effects on athletic performance; treatment strategies (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, massage, cryotherapy, stretching, homeopathy, ultrasound, electrical current, exercise); return-to-training advice.
Sample: n = not given in the abstract (no studies or participants are counted).
Funding and interests: not stated in the abstract; PubMed indexes the paper as "Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't" without naming the funder. The full text could not be read, so declared interests are unknown.

Key Results

The authors' conclusions by topic (abstract; no numbers are given), with how the base stands on each today:

TopicWhat the abstract says (the authors' synthesis)Where the base stands now
When DOMS appearsmost common at the start of a season after reduced activity, and on first exposure to certain activities at any time of yearconsistent with REF-660 (least accustomed suffer most) and REF-1347
Type of workeccentric actions cause micro-injury more often and more severely than other actions; intensity and duration also matterconsistent with REF-704, REF-1347
Causeup to six proposed theories — lactic acid, muscle spasm, connective-tissue damage, muscle damage, inflammation, enzyme efflux; probably two or more combinedstill debated; REF-1347 (2019) favours inflammatory sensitisation of nerve endings (nerve growth factor, GDNF) and also lists lactic acid only as a proposed hypothesis
Performancelower joint range of motion, shock attenuation and peak torque; altered muscle sequencing and recruitment may stress ligaments and tendons; injury risk on a premature returnstrength loss confirmed as the best indirect marker (REF-1351, REF-1347); in cycling, damage lowered sprint and peak power but not time trials (REF-701)
Anti-inflammatory drugsdose-dependent effects, possibly depending on when they are takenREF-1347 advises against them in healthy people; kidney and gut risks in REF-892, REF-983
Massagevarying results, attributed to timing and techniqueovertaken: most effective technique for DOMS in a meta-analysis of 99 studies (REF-385, A)
Cryotherapyno effect on soreness or other DOMS symptomsovertaken: cryotherapy and immersion reduced DOMS (REF-385, A); one cold-water immersion lowered soreness at 24 h, not strength recovery (REF-250, A)
Stretching, homeopathy, ultrasound, electrical currentno effectstretching and electrostimulation: no change in REF-385 (agrees)
Exercisethe most effective means of relieving DOMS pain; the effect is temporaryno newer entry tests this
Advice1-2 days of reduced intensity and duration after intense DOMS-inducing exercise, or work on less affected body parts; introduce eccentric or novel exercise over 1-2 weeksrecommendations, not tested here; consistent with the repeated-bout effect (REF-549, REF-1297)
Not in the abstract: any time course (hours to onset, peak, resolution), any effect size, any population. The time course in the base comes from REF-1347, read in full: soreness appears 12-24 h after, peaks at 24-72 h and is gone within 5-7 days.

Mechanisms

Measured: nothing in this review; it measures no outcome of its own.
Authors' interpretation: DOMS has no single cause; of six proposed mechanisms (lactic acid, muscle spasm, connective-tissue damage, muscle damage, inflammation, enzyme efflux) an integration of two or more is likely.
Authors' interpretation: DOMS costs performance through reduced range of motion, shock attenuation and peak torque, and through altered recruitment that loads ligaments and tendons in unaccustomed ways.
Inference: listing lactic acid among the hypotheses is not support for it, and the abstract does not weigh the six. The base's case against lactate as the cause of next-day soreness rests elsewhere: an active cool-down clears blood lactate faster and did not reduce soreness (REF-913); no entry tests lactate against soreness directly (SYNTH-83).

Practical Application

Why do my legs hurt most after a new or downhill session? Unaccustomed, mostly eccentric work brings delayed soreness; this 2003 review lists six proposed causes, expects several together and advises 1-2 easier days (C+, abstract).
After a session that left you very sore, keep the next one or two days easier or train other body parts (the authors' advice, not tested in the abstract). Exercise eases the pain but only for a while; how long strength stays down is in REF-1347 and SYNTH-23.
Bring in new eccentric work — downhills, plyometrics, first gym weeks — over one to two weeks (authors' advice). The base's evidence for why that works is the repeated-bout effect: one bout protects against the next (REF-549, B+; REF-1297, A-, multi-joint exercise).
Do not use this review for the choice of a recovery tool. Its "no effect" verdict on cryotherapy and its mixed verdict on massage are overtaken by REF-385 (A: massage best for DOMS; cryotherapy and immersion help; stretching does not) and REF-250 (A: cold water lowers soreness at 24 h but does not bring strength back faster). For endurance athletes no tool showed a consistent performance benefit (REF-1321, B+).
What it is good for as a source: the general picture — DOMS follows unaccustomed eccentric work, its cause is unsettled, it lowers range of motion and torque. It is not a source for time course numbers, for treatment effects, or for whether soreness tracks adaptation (for that, REF-1346).

Limitations

Read from the abstract only. The included studies, their populations, designs and results could not be checked; the abstract carries no numbers.
Narrative review with no stated search or appraisal method; the verdicts are the authors' synthesis of the pre-2003 literature.
Dated treatment verdicts. Cryotherapy ("no effect") and massage ("varying results") are contradicted by later A-level meta-analyses (REF-385, REF-250); stretching ("no effect") agrees with them.
No time course. The abstract does not say when DOMS starts, peaks or ends.
Advice untested. The 1-2-day easing and the 1-2-week introduction of eccentric work are recommendations, not trial results.
Funding and interests: not named; PubMed lists non-US-government research support.
How this entry was checked and changed
Why this level

a narrative review without a stated systematic method, from a sports-science school (Auckland University of Technology) that is not one of the field's leading muscle-damage laboratories; it is widely cited, which the rubric does not count. Read from the abstract only: there is no Europe PMC copy and OpenAlex lists no repository copy. Two of its treatment verdicts (cold, massage) are contradicted by later meta-analyses in the base (REF-385, REF-250)