REF-1418 · McCormick et al., 2019 · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · Paper · PubMed

When should a runner take iron?

In 16 runners with low ferritin, iron in breakfast 30 min after a morning run was absorbed best despite hepcidin rising 3 h after the run. One labelled meal, not a supplement trial.

Main caveat: Abstract only; the full text was not open.
moderate evidenceMeasured on trained to highly trained athletes

McCormick and colleagues (Perth, with the ETH Zurich isotope group) asked whether the time of day of an endurance session changes post-exercise inflammation, hepcidin and iron absorption. Sixteen endurance-trained runners (10 men, 6 women) with ferritin below 50 µg/L ran 90 min at 65% of the velocity at VO2max in the morning or in the afternoon in a crossover design.

Thirty minutes after the exercise and control conditions of each trial, they took an iron-fortified drink labelled with a stable iron isotope with a standardised meal, serving as breakfast or dinner; erythrocyte incorporation 14 days later gave absorption.

Exercise raised IL-6 (by 4.938 pg/mL, P = 0.006) and, 3 h after exercise, hepcidin (by 0.380 nM, P < 0.001); in the afternoon trial hepcidin showed a diurnal rise at rest (0.55 nM, P = 0.007) before rising a further 0.68 nM from before the run to 3 h after.

Even so, fractional absorption was greatest at breakfast after the morning run — greater than the rested condition (0.778%, P = 0.020) and than dinner in the morning-run trial (0.672%, P = 0.011). The authors suggest a transient mechanism in the acute post-exercise window that promotes absorption despite rising hepcidin.

Our reading: with REF-1421 (iron in a meal 2 h after a long run absorbed 36% less) it turns PHYS-36's "one isotope study each way" into two entries that differ in timing — 30 min after a moderate morning run vs 2 h after a long one — rather than flatly contradicting each other.

Protocol

Participants: n = 16 endurance-trained runners (10 men, 6 women), serum ferritin < 50 µg/L.
Exercise: 90-min run at 65% vVO2max in the morning (AM) or afternoon (PM), crossover.
Iron: an iron-fortified fluid labelled with stable iron isotopes (the isotope numbers are lost in the PubMed abstract text), given with a standardised meal 30 min after the exercise and control conditions of each trial, serving as breakfast and dinner.
Blood: before, immediately after and 3 h after exercise and control conditions (ferritin, IL-6, hepcidin-25); 14 days after each trial for erythrocyte isotope incorporation.
Analysis: linear mixed models.
Funding and interests: PubMed lists "Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't" without naming funders; no conflict-of-interest statement in the abstract record. Affiliations include Hepcidinanalysis.com, Nijmegen (listed separately from Radboud University Medical Centre), Triathlon Australia and the Australian Institute of Sport, as printed.

Key Results

Inflammation: exercise increased IL-6 by 4.938 pg/mL (P = 0.006).
Hepcidin: increased 0.380 nM 3 h after exercise (P < 0.001); in the PM trial, a diurnal rise of 0.55 nM at rest (P = 0.007), then a further 0.68 nM from before the run to 3 h after (P < 0.001).
Absorption: fractional iron absorption was significantly greater at breakfast after the AM run than in the rested condition (0.778%; P = 0.020) and than at dinner in the AM-run trial (0.672%; P = 0.011).
Not in the abstract: absolute absorption values, the PM-run absorption, results by sex, and how the differences of 0.778% and 0.672% are expressed (they read as percentage points of fractional absorption; our reading).

Mechanisms

Measured: IL-6 rose after a 90-min run and hepcidin was raised 3 h after it; hepcidin also rose across the day at rest.
Authors' interpretation: "there may be a transient mechanism during the acute postexercise window to promote iron absorption opposing the homeostatic regulation by serum hepcidin elevations".
Inference: the labelled meal came 30 min after exercise, before the 3-h hepcidin rise, and in the morning, when resting hepcidin is lowest; REF-1421 fed 2 h after a longer run and found less absorption. Together they fit a short window right after exercise followed by a hepcidin-driven dip, but no study in the base tested a window directly.

Practical Application

When should a runner take iron? In 16 runners with low ferritin, iron in breakfast 30 min after a morning run was absorbed best despite hepcidin rising 3 h after the run. One labelled meal, not a supplement trial.
The timing row, with its limits: morning, soon after a morning session, was the one window measured as better (B+, absorption of fortified meal iron); a meal 2 h after a long run was worse (REF-1421, B).Not from this paper; the base's own practice in SYNTH-06 (inference from the hepcidin mechanism): not in the hours after a hard session — consistent with REF-1421 (a meal 2 h after a long run) but not with this study, where iron 30 min after a 90-min moderate morning run was absorbed best; the two differ in timing, session and iron form.
Which day: neither study compares training days with rest days for a supplement; on an alternate-day schedule (REF-1416) the day is the prescriber's choice; placing the dose on the morning of an easy or morning-session day would be practice built on these two studies, not a finding.
What it does not show: whether timing changes ferritin over weeks, how a tablet on an empty stomach behaves, or the effect after harder or longer sessions.

Limitations

Abstract only; the full text was not open.
Small: 16 runners, 6 women.
One labelled meal per condition; fortified drink with food, not a supplement; no ferritin change over time.
Design details (trial order, randomisation, the rested condition's timing) are not in the abstract; PubMed's RCT label is the indexer's.
Units: the absorption differences are printed as 0.778% and 0.672%.
Funding and interests: funders not named in the record; one affiliation is Hepcidinanalysis.com (as printed); no conflict statement in the record.
How this entry was checked and changed
Why this level

(from the abstract) — a controlled crossover with 16 participants (rubric B+ for at least 15); the outcome is absorption from one labelled meal and hepcidin, not iron status or performance, and the order of trials is not described in the abstract