REF-1627 · American College of Sports Medicine, 2009 · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, Vol. · Paper · PubMed

ACSM's 2009 position stand for healthy adults: novices lift 8-12 RM loads 2-3 days a week, intermediates 3-4 and advanced lifters 4-5 days with periodised 1-12 RM loads, eventually stressing 1-6 RM with 3-5 min rests, and the load goes up 2-10% once one or two reps beyond the target are possible; the abstract gives no number of sets for novices or for strength

Main caveat: Written from the abstract and the PubMed record; full text not read, so the evidence behind each recommendation, and any grading of it, is not checked here.
moderate evidenceMeasured on non-athletes to trained athletesRead from the abstract only

The American College of Sports Medicine sets out how healthy adults should progress resistance training toward a chosen goal.

For strength it recommends lifting, lowering and isometric actions, work on one and both limbs, and both single- and multi-joint exercises, ordered to protect intensity: large muscle groups before small, multi-joint before single-joint, heavier before lighter. Novices (no lifting experience, or several years without it) should use loads of 8-12 RM.

Intermediate lifters (about 6 months of steady training) and advanced ones (years of it) should cycle loads across 1-12 RM, eventually stressing heavy 1-6 RM work with 3-5 min between sets at a moderate tempo (1-2 s up, 1-2 s down). The load rises by 2-10% once the lifter can do one or two reps more than the target.

Weekly frequency climbs with experience: 2-3 days for novices, 3-4 for intermediates, 4-5 for advanced. Hypertrophy programmes keep the same exercise choice and frequency, cycle 1-12 RM with the emphasis on 6-12 RM and 1-2 min rests, and favour higher-volume, multiple-set designs.

Power training pairs strength work with light, fast lifts (0-60% 1RM for the legs, 30-60% for the upper body), 3-5 sets per exercise with 3-5 min rest, mostly multi-joint and whole-body. Local muscular endurance uses 40-60% 1RM for more than 15 reps with under 90 s of rest. The stand adds that each recommendation depends on the person's goals, capacity and training status.

Participants

No sample: a position stand for healthy adults.
Training levels as the stand defines them: novice — untrained, or no resistance training for several years; intermediate — about 6 months of consistent resistance training; advanced — years of it.

Protocol

How the recommendations were reached: not in the abstract; no literature search, grading of evidence or consensus process is described.
PubMed indexes the paper as a practice guideline and a review (its MeSH terms include Evidence-Based Medicine).
Scope: strength, hypertrophy, power and local muscular endurance training in healthy adults.

Key Results

Goal and levelLoadRest between setsTempoDays a weekSets
Strength, novice8-12 RMnot in the abstractnot in the abstract2-3not in the abstract
Strength, intermediate1-12 RM, periodised, eventual emphasis on 1-6 RM3-5 minmoderate: 1-2 s concentric, 1-2 s eccentric3-4not in the abstract
Strength, advancedas intermediate3-5 minas intermediate4-5not in the abstract
Hypertrophy1-12 RM, periodised, emphasis on 6-12 RM1-2 minmoderateas for strengthhigher-volume, multiple-set programmes
Powerstrength training plus light loads: 0-60% 1RM lower body, 30-60% 1RM upper body3-5 minfastnot in the abstract3-5 per exercise
Local muscular endurance40-60% 1RM for more than 15 repsunder 90 snot in the abstractnot in the abstractnot in the abstract
Progression: raise the load 2-10% when the current load can be lifted for 1-2 reps beyond the target number.
Exercise order: large before small muscle groups, multi-joint before single-joint, higher before lower intensity.
Strength exercise types: concentric, eccentric and isometric actions; bilateral and unilateral; single- and multi-joint.
Power: emphasis on multi-joint exercises, especially whole-body ones.
No effect sizes, study counts or evidence grades are in the abstract.

Practical Application

A novice starts at 8-12 RM, 2-3 days a week. That is all the abstract gives specifically for novices (exercise types, order and the 2-10% load rule are stated for strength programmes in general); it gives no number of sets for novices (sets appear only for power, 3-5 per exercise, and as "multiple-set" programmes for hypertrophy). For how many sets, use the set-number meta-analysis REF-1626 and the weekly-volume entries REF-1623 and REF-1477 rather than this stand.
Add load by the rep overshoot. When a lifter working at, say, 10 RM manages 11-12 reps, the stand says add 2-10%: on 60 kg that is 61.2-66 kg (our arithmetic, for an example lifter). Not from this paper; the base's own practice: take the smallest load step available and write the next number from the last sets done and their RPE (SYNTH-101).
Put the big lifts first. Large before small, multi-joint before single-joint, heavier before lighter, so that exercise intensity is preserved, the stand's stated reason.
Frequency follows experience. 2-3, 3-4 and 4-5 days a week for novice, intermediate and advanced lifters; hypertrophy programmes use the same frequencies.
Inference, not tested here: an endurance athlete should not copy the advanced 4-5 days a week. The stand addresses healthy adults in general and says nothing about endurance training alongside (our reading); the base's gym dose for cyclists and runners is in SYNTH-43 and SYNTH-44.
Treat the numbers as a professional body's recommendations, not as measured effects. The abstract gives no effect sizes and shows no graded review behind them.

Limitations

Written from the abstract and the PubMed record; full text not read, so the evidence behind each recommendation, and any grading of it, is not checked here.
A position stand: recommendations, not measured effects; the abstract gives no effect sizes.
No set numbers for strength or for novices in the abstract.
Published in 2009 and updated by ACSM's 2026 stand, REF-1476 (built on an overview of 137 systematic reviews: at least 2 sessions a week, 2-3 sets per session for strength, at least 10 weekly sets for muscle size; it could not establish minimal-dose programmes). Where the two differ, quote the 2026 stand.
The stand itself says its recommendations depend on the individual's goals, physical capacity and training status.
How this entry was checked and changed
Why this level

a position stand, and the abstract shows no graded systematic review behind it (no literature search, evidence grading or panel process is described), which the rubric caps at B+; read from the abstract only, and its recommendations come without effect sizes or the studies behind them

Content correction 2026-11-06
2026-11-06: added from the abstract and the PubMed record; level B+ (position stand; the abstract shows no graded systematic review behind it).