REF-1639 · Alcaraz et al., 2011 · Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · Paper · PubMed

A heavy circuit (6RM, about 35 s between sets) built the same bench press and half-squat 1RM, bench press power and lean mass as the same sets with 3-min rests in 33 resistance-trained men over 8 weeks, in shorter sessions; only the long-rest group raised 30-s Wingate peak power, and only the circuit group lowered % body fat

Main caveat: 33 men in three arms, about 11 per group; "equal" gains are not shown to be equivalent.
moderate evidenceMeasured on recreational to trained athletesRead from the abstract only

Alcaraz and colleagues asked whether a heavy-load circuit, which shortens the rest between sets, brings the same adaptations as traditional strength training with long rests.

Thirty-three healthy men were randomised to a high-resistance circuit (HRC: 3-6 sets of 6 exercises at 6RM, about 35 s between sets), traditional strength training (TS: the same sets and loads with 3 min between sets) or a control group; both training groups lifted three times a week for 8 weeks.

Before and after, the authors tested bench press and half squat 1RM, bench press peak power, body composition by DXA, a shuttle run and a 30-s Wingate test. Both training groups raised upper- and lower-limb 1RM to the same extent, produced more bench press peak power across loads (p ≤ 0.01), ran the shuttle better and gained lean mass but not bone mass.

Wingate peak power rose only after TS (p ≤ 0.05), and % body fat fell only after HRC. The authors conclude that HRC gives a strength and mass adaptation similar to traditional training while taking less session time.

Participants

n = 33 healthy men, resistance-trained according to the title.
Not in the abstract: age, training history, baseline strength, group sizes, dropouts.

Protocol

Random allocation to HRC, TS or control; lifting 3 times a week for 8 weeks.
HRC: 3-6 sets of 6 exercises at 6RM, about 35 s between sets.
TS: the same scheme (3-6 sets of 6 exercises at 6RM), with 3 min between sets.
Tests before and after: bench press and half squat 1RM; bench press peak power at several loads; body composition by DXA (fat, lean and bone mass); shuttle run; 30-s Wingate cycling test.
Not in the abstract: the six exercises, how sets rose from 3 to 6, session durations, what the control group did, any training outside the study.

Key Results

OutcomeHRC (about 35-s rests)TS (3-min rests)
Bench press and half squat 1RMincreasedincreased; equal to HRC
Bench press peak power, several loadshigher (p ≤ 0.01)higher (p ≤ 0.01)
Shuttle runbetterbetter
30-s Wingate peak powerno significant riseincreased (p ≤ 0.05)
% body fatdecreasedno significant change
Lean massincreasedincreased
Bone massno increaseno increase
The abstract gives no group means, effect sizes or between-group statistics beyond these statements; HRC sessions were shorter, by how much is not in the abstract.

Practical Application

Short rests in a heavy circuit did not cost strength. Rotating through six exercises at 6RM with about 35 s between sets built the same bench and half-squat 1RM, bench power and lean mass over 8 weeks as the same work with 3-min rests, in less time; for a time-poor athlete a heavy circuit is a fair way to fit strength work in.
Only the long-rest group gained Wingate peak power. Inference, not tested here: a cyclist who lifts for sprint power may do better keeping long rests; the evidence is one 30-s test in groups of about 11.
The circuit also cut % body fat; the traditional sets did not. Lean mass rose in both groups.
Not settled by this design: whether the heavy circuit works the same for endurance athletes training concurrently, for women or beyond 8 weeks; whether the "equal" strength gains hide a small difference that groups of about 11 cannot detect; how much session time was saved.

Limitations

33 men in three arms, about 11 per group; "equal" gains are not shown to be equivalent.
The abstract gives directions and p thresholds only, no sizes.
Resistance-trained men only; age and training history not in the abstract.
The abstract does not mention endurance training alongside the lifting; concurrent training may change the result.
Written from the abstract and the PubMed record; full text not read.
How this entry was checked and changed
Why this level

parallel RCT, 33 in three arms (11 per arm by the rubric's division; group sizes not in the abstract); the abstract gives directions and p thresholds, no group means or effect sizes

Content correction 2026-11-07
2026-11-07: added from the abstract and the PubMed record; level B+ (parallel RCT, 33 in three arms).