Ferrous sulfate raised haemoglobin by 0.42 g/dL (95% CI 0.10-0.74; 8 RCTs) and ferritin by 12.61 ng/mL (8.29-16.92; 7 RCTs) against control in active women and girls, most in groups whose mean starting ferritin was under 20 ng/mL (ferritin +14.16); across 42 diet and supplement trials none of the 15 interventions that measured VO2max, lactate or inflammation changed them significantly, by the authors' summary. Read in full
McCarthy and colleagues (University of Illinois Chicago) reviewed every interventional trial they could find in which a diet or dietary supplement was tested on iron status in physically active females of reproductive age, and pooled the trials that allowed it.
From 6759 records they included 42 trials, run on five continents with 5 to 171 participants each: 18 of oral iron alone, 9 combining oral iron with another dietary component (vitamin C, milk, a probiotic, lactoferrin), 5 of food-based iron, 5 of dietary or lifestyle change and 5 of other supplements. Only ferrous sulfate had enough parallel-arm RCTs to pool.
Against control, it raised haemoglobin by 0.42 g/dL (95% CI 0.10-0.74; 8 RCTs; I² 56.6%) and ferritin by 12.61 ng/mL (8.29-16.92; 7 RCTs; I² 57.38%), and leave-one-out analyses kept both significant.
By baseline status, the gains were significant in trials whose mean ferritin was under 20 ng/mL (ferritin +14.16, haemoglobin +0.49) and not in the single trial with mean ferritin 20-35 ng/mL; the two trials with normal mean status were mixed. Longer trials went with smaller ferritin gains and, in the joint model, larger haemoglobin gains; dose was not a significant predictor.
Outside the meta-analysis, oral iron with or without vitamin C and some iron-rich foods improved iron markers, other supplements (colostrum, pea or soy protein, a carbohydrate-protein drink) mostly did not, and a ketogenic diet lowered haemoglobin.
The authors conclude that ferrous sulfate improves haemoglobin and ferritin in active females, most clearly from low stores, and that care should be personalised.
Participants
Protocol
Key Results
Ferrous sulfate against control (random effects):
| Outcome | Mean difference (95% CI) | Trials | Heterogeneity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Haemoglobin | +0.42 g/dL (0.10-0.74), p = 0.0109 | 8 RCTs | I² 56.6%, τ² 0.11, Q = 15.42 (p = 0.031) |
| Ferritin | +12.61 ng/mL (8.29-16.92), p < 0.0001 | 7 RCTs | I² 57.38%, τ² 17.66, Q = 13.99 (p = 0.0297) |
| Ferritin, baseline mean < 20 ng/mL (iron deficiency without anaemia) | +14.16 ng/mL (9.22-19.10), p < 0.0001 | subgroup | — |
| Haemoglobin, baseline mean < 20 ng/mL | +0.49 g/dL (0.1651-0.8244), p = 0.0033 | subgroup | — |
| Ferritin, baseline mean 20-35 ng/mL | positive, not significant | 1 trial | — |
| Ferritin, normal baseline (> 35 ng/mL) | mixed: one significant gain, one with wide uncertainty | 2 trials | — |
Practical Application
Limitations
How this entry was checked and changed
the pooled part is a meta-analysis of RCTs whose risk of bias we read (all 8 pooled trials rated low in every domain by the authors), held to A- by mostly small trials (14-171 per trial) and moderate heterogeneity with no certainty grading; no marker step, because haemoglobin and ferritin are the iron-status outcomes this entry is about (rule 3), the same reading as the base's other oral-iron meta-analysis