SYNTH-69 · Guide

Eating around training

Set carbohydrate by what the day holds, keep protein near 1.8 g/kg spread through the day (not lower on rest days), fuel every key session, and use "train low" only on easy sessions inside an adequately fed week; meal timing is a smaller lever than the daily totals

Blimited evidenceMostly from recreational to elite athletesWritten before October 2026, being re-checked

The question it answers

"What should I eat today?", "breakfast before intervals?", "what after a long ride?", "should I ride fasted?" In-ride grams: SYNTH-02; weight loss: SYNTH-54; marathon loading: SYNTH-64.

Default (what to prescribe first)

1

Energy availability is the floor. The UCI statement (REF-748, A) sets a habitual 40-45 kcal/kg fat-free mass per day (lower end for riders with little activity outside training) and accepts short, planned periods of low availability only if recovery follows.

REDs affects men and women (REF-341, A); that low energy availability can look like overtraining is the entry's own application line. In 12 trained-to-elite men, 14 days at ~22 kcal/kg FFM cut explosive power and haemoglobin before hormones changed (REF-545, B, uncontrolled pre-post).

2

Carbohydrate by the day's load, in g/kg, not as % of energy (REF-748; REF-070, B pending verification, same unit). UCI rows: light endurance 5-7 g/kg/day, moderate endurance (<3 h/day) 6-10, intensified (>4 h/day) >8, extreme racing 10-25; the entry's own application, not a line of the statement, is a 90-min session = a 5-7 g/kg day and a 4-h ride = a >8 g/kg day (REF-748). Fat ~20-35% of energy, moving inversely to carbohydrate on the day (REF-748).

3

Protein ~1.8 g/kg/day, spread over the day. The endurance review advocates ~1.8 g/kg/day and notes it may exceed 2.0 on rest days and in carbohydrate-restricted training per its abstract; its Table 1 targets 2.0 on recovery days and 1.95 on low-carbohydrate training days (corrected 2026-10-12) (REF-151, A, narrative); UCI gives 1.6-2.1 with the upper end in low-carbohydrate or energy-restricted periods (REF-748).

By the IAAO method: recommended 1.83 g/kg/day in 6 trained men (REF-156, B), 1.81 in men and 1.89 in women runners (REF-725, B+). The ISSN stand doses 0.25 g/kg (20-40 g) evenly every 3-4 h (REF-578, A).

Not from a study; the base's own practice: four to five protein feedings of roughly 0.4 g/kg (arithmetic on 1.8 g/kg/day), one within a couple of hours after the session. REF-151's Table 1 recommends 0.5 g/kg in immediate post-exercise recovery (preliminary, single study) (corrected 2026-10-12).

4

Fuel the key sessions; practise train-low only on easy ones (REF-543, B+, framework). Details below.

Decision (who → what)

The dayCarbohydrateProtein and timingSource and how sure
Rest dayNo rest-day row in the base. Not from a study; the base's own practice: eat to appetite, at or a little below the light-day row, and do not cut to "earn" foodHold protein at or above the training-day totalREF-151 A (may exceed 2.0 g/kg on rest days); REF-152 B (endurance-trained men at a fixed 0.93 g/kg: the rest day had the lowest protein synthesis and net balance)
Easy day (~1-1.5 h easy)5-7 g/kg~1.8 g/kg; the day a fasted or protein-only start fitsREF-748 A; REF-543 B+ (train-low on base sessions); REF-157 B+ (fasted start acutely costless in one short session)
Hard / interval day6-10 g/kg (UCI's <3 h/day row; mapping an interval day to it is the base's own practice)Normal distribution; a carbohydrate-rich meal before the session is practiceREF-748 A; REF-543 B+: intensity must not be compromised
Long day (over ~4 h)>8 g/kg; in-ride grams → SYNTH-02Breakfast before; calcium-rich if long or sweaty (practice; the trial was one 90-min ride)REF-748 A; REF-544 B+ (female cyclists, surrogate markers)
Two sessions, <~6 h apart (the trial tested a 4-h gap; ~6 h is practice)Recovery dose 1-1.2 g/kg/h starting soon after the first; fast (high-GI) and part fructose0.3-0.4 g/kg protein with itREF-748 A; REF-734 B+; REF-057 B; REF-056 B; the whole decision for close sessions: SYNTH-85
Race eve and morning, event >90 min10-12 g/kg/day for 1-2 days before a single-day event; 1-4 g/kg in the 1-4 h before the startRehearse the menu in training (practice)REF-748 A; REF-819 B+ (loading pays only >90 min)
Train-low sessionReduced availability for that one easy session; the day and week still cover the workProtein up: 1.95 g/kg in REF-151's Table 1 (its abstract: may exceed 2.0) (corrected 2026-10-12); train-low raised the requirement without quantifying it (REF-726)REF-543 B+; REF-726 B; REF-003 B+; REF-954 C+ (ten trained men, crossover: after a glycogen-depleting session, peak fat oxidation in a graded test the next day rose further with a low-carbohydrate diet than with a high-carbohydrate one; mitochondrial coupling control and efficiency unchanged; no performance outcome)

Before a session. In 17 trained male cyclists, a session of submaximal stages plus 6 × 3-min intervals gave the same interval power (367 ± 51 W), RPE and hunger after an overnight fast, a 1 g/kg carbohydrate meal, or a protein-fat meal (0.45 g/kg protein + 0.24 g/kg fat) eaten 30 min before; fasting raised fat oxidation, and the protein meal kept it similarly high (REF-157, B+).

Transfer: one short session in trained men; it does not show that a long or race-intensity session can be done unfed. Before a long effort, a ~2 g/kg breakfast with about a third from fructose extended time to exhaustion by ~7 min (137 vs 130 min) in 8 trained men (REF-065, B; p = .046, a tweak).

A dairy meal with ~1350 mg calcium before a 90-min ride blunted the rise in bone-resorption markers in 32 well-trained female cyclists (REF-544, B+; markers, not bone density). Not from a study; the base's own practice: a larger meal 3-4 h before a hard session, or a small carbohydrate snack 30-60 min before if the session comes early.

After a key session — the "window". Timing matters when the next hard session is close.

In 12 male cyclists, 2 g/kg carbohydrate taken immediately after a 70-min ride stored glycogen at 7.7 vs 2.5 μmol/g/h over 2 h compared with waiting 2 h, and once fed the late group's rate (4.1) stayed below the early group's first-2-h rate (REF-056, B); the entry's own inference is that with 24 h and adequate intake glycogen catches up.

Over 24 h at the same 10 g/kg, high-GI carbohydrate restored more glycogen than low-GI (106 vs 71.5 mmol/kg, 5 cyclists; REF-057, B) — the entry applies it when the next hard session is within a day. With 4 h between two runs, fructose + maltodextrin recovery at the same 90 g/h gave a longer second run (81.4 vs 61.4 min, n=8; REF-734, B+; direction firm, magnitude not).

There is no compelling evidence that protein added to adequate carbohydrate improves performance or glycogen resynthesis (REF-151, A). Inference: post-session protein serves the day's total, not the glycogen. Pre-sleep 20-40 g casein raised overnight protein synthesis in young men after resistance exercise and in older men; there are no endurance-athlete data (REF-155, A).

Masters. Per-meal protein saturated MPS at ~0.40 g/kg in healthy men aged ~71 vs ~0.24 g/kg at ~22 (REF-348, B; p = .055 per kg body mass; untrained men — transfer). In resistance training, the lean-mass benefit of protein fell with age (REF-579, A; lifting, not endurance). UCI gives masters riders the upper protein band (REF-748).

The REF-348 entry's own application: size each feeding for roughly 0.4 g/kg. The REF-543 entry adds, as not from that paper, that masters athletes should start train-low at a lower frequency.

Women. Protein requirement did not differ by sex in endurance runners (1.60 vs 1.61 g/kg/day breakpoint, n=15; REF-725, B+); a narrative review found it premature to set sex-specific carbohydrate or protein guidelines provided energy needs are met (REF-582, C+).

Female endurance athletes are less likely than men to meet carbohydrate guidelines, because of energy restriction (REF-070, B). A lengthening or missing cycle during a hard block is a fuelling question first (REF-748; SYNTH-37 for the cycle itself).

Vegetarian and vegan athletes. Per gram, soy and wheat protein raised muscle protein synthesis less than animal protein — lower essential amino-acid content, often short in lysine or methionine, and slower digestion — and eating more, blending sources or fortifying can compensate (REF-912, B+, narrative review of acute studies; no gram target).

With total protein matched at 1.6 g/kg/day (soy for vegans, whey for omnivores), 19 habitual vegan and 19 omnivorous untrained young men gained the same leg lean mass (1.2 kg each) and strength over 12 weeks of resistance training (REF-911, B+, non-randomised; lifting, not endurance — transfer).

Inference: a plant-based endurance athlete keeps the same ~1.8 g/kg/day target, never a lower one, from combined sources; whether it should be higher is untested (REF-912's authors ask).

How to progress / periodise

Match the plate to tomorrow. Not from a study; the base's own practice: a hard or long day next means a carbohydrate-rich dinner and breakfast; an easy or rest day next, an ordinary plate.
Train-low as a dose. The studies REF-543 tallies placed 30-50% of sessions low; the entry calls one or two a week the conventional starting point, not a number from the paper.The sleep-low model: evening intervals fuelled, no carbohydrate overnight, a low-carbohydrate session next morning — in 21 trained triathletes, 3 weeks of this at the same 6 g/kg/day improved 10-km run time by 2.9% vs 0.1% (REF-003, B+; randomised parallel groups per the full text (corrected 2026-10-12)).
Example days — labelled practice, not from a study. For a 70-kg athlete the UCI rows give, by arithmetic: easy day 350-490 g carbohydrate, a 4-h day >560 g; protein at 1.8 g/kg is ~126 g, i.e. four feedings of ~30 g. *Easy day:* oats with milk or yoghurt and fruit; a rice or bread lunch with eggs, fish or legumes; a protein snack; an ordinary dinner. *Hard evening intervals:* same breakfast and lunch, a carbohydrate snack 1-2 h before, then dinner with rice, pasta or potatoes plus 25-40 g protein. *Long Saturday:* a larger breakfast 2-3 h before (dairy for calcium), in-ride carbohydrate per SYNTH-02, a carbohydrate-and-protein meal soon after, a big dinner.Scale portions to the athlete.

When NOT to use it / red flags

Never underfuel a hard or long day to lose weight. Practice: deficits belong on easy days and in the off-season (SYNTH-54, where both are labelled practice); a REDs indicator (a missed cycle in women, low libido or low testosterone in men — REF-341, A; the full screen is in SYNTH-54) ends the conversation about eating less.
Do not do train-low around key sessions, races or tests — the train-low evidence reaching performance "is currently limited" (REF-748) and improved performance in 37% of 11 studies (REF-543).
Do not confuse train-low with a low-carbohydrate diet. In 29 world-class race walkers, 3 weeks of a ketogenic diet gave no 10-km improvement (−1.6%) while high-carbohydrate (6.6%) and periodised (5.3%) groups improved (REF-486, B+; race walking — transfer).A review of 33 studies in trained athletes reports, as shares of studies and not as pooled effects, that all 30 studies measuring fat oxidation found increases (+28% to +200%) and that 50.0% of the studies measuring submaximal exercise economy documented impaired efficiency — four studies, by its own table (REF-1009, C+; a tally of study directions rated with a tool for observational studies).Its "1-week adaptation threshold", after which performance is said to be maintained or improved, is not supported by its own tables: the ≤7-day side is two sources (a conference abstract and a commentary), and the >1-week side counts as maintained a 3-week race-walker study recorded as 2.3% slower and a 31-day ketogenic study recorded as impaired above 70% VO2max.Do not tell an athlete the cost of a low-carbohydrate diet passes after a week.
Time-restricted eating: in 16 elite under-23 male cyclists, an 8-h window at 100% of estimated needs for 4 weeks cut weight 2% with performance unchanged, but free testosterone and IGF-1 fell (REF-520, B). Inference, as the entry says: a compressed window often becomes a deficit; the entry's practice is not to combine it with an aggressive deficit in heavy training.Across 16 small trials in 245 athletes, pooled energy intake on time-restricted eating pointed down without reaching significance (SMD −0.35, 95% CI −0.77 to 0.07), body mass and body fat% fell slightly, and aerobic capacity, strength and power were not significantly changed; certainty very low to moderate, and no REDs indicator was pooled (REF-1007, B+) — the screen in SYNTH-54 still comes first.
Do not load carbohydrate for an event under ~90 min — no benefit for moderate-intensity running or cycling of 60-90 min (REF-819, B+).

What the evidence does and does not show

Shows: daily carbohydrate and protein ranges from A consensus (REF-748, REF-578, REF-063 (A) 5-7 / 6-10 g/kg from its full text); a protein requirement near 1.8 g/kg/day by IAAO in small samples (REF-156, REF-725); faster glycogen storage with early, high-GI and fructose-containing recovery carbohydrate in short-gap lab designs (REF-056, REF-057, REF-734); one day of rest plus 10 g/kg high-GI carbohydrate maximised muscle glycogen in 8 men with no further rise over two more days (REF-891, B).
Does not show: that meal timing changes adaptation or performance across a training block when daily totals are met; any rest-day carbohydrate number; that the per-meal dose for endurance athletes is established (REF-151's abstract declines to set one, though its Key Points give a preliminary ~0.5 g/kg per meal from a single study (corrected 2026-10-12); REF-580's 0.4 g/kg over ≥4 meals is a C+ inference from strength data); that UCI's elite numbers transfer unchanged to amateurs (REF-748 names this as open).

Evidence gaps

No study of vegetarian or vegan endurance athletes (iron, protein dose, endurance outcomes); the plant-protein evidence is a lifting trial in untrained men (REF-911) and an acute-synthesis review (REF-912).
No rest-day carbohydrate recommendation and no trial comparing rest-day carbohydrate levels.
No endurance trial of recovery-window timing with a 24-h or longer gap and a performance outcome.
No direct study of the pre-exercise meal 1-4 h before in amateurs; the 1-4 g/kg range is UCI consensus, not a dose-response trial in this base.
Women and masters are thin: most timing studies are young trained men; REF-348 is untrained older men.
How this entry was checked and changed
Why this level

(daily targets rest on A consensus written largely for trained or elite athletes, transfer to amateurs named as open; timing, recovery and train-low rows on B/B+ crossovers of 5-21 mostly trained men; example days are practice)

Content correction 2026-09-27
Revision 2026-09-30: folded in REF-912 (Pinckaers 2021, B+ review: plant protein gives less muscle protein synthesis per gram; more, blends or fortification compensate) and REF-911 (Hevia-Larraín 2021, B+: vegans and omnivores matched at 1.6 g/kg/day gained equally over 12 weeks of lifting, untrained men) into the vegetarian/vegan paragraph, replacing the 'no study' line and the REF-151 inference.Default (~1.8 g/kg/day for everyone) unchanged; the plant-based line is now 'same target, never lower', labelled inference. Gap narrowed to endurance outcomes, iron and dose. Level unchanged (B).
Revision 2026-10-01: folded REF-954 (Lange 2026, C+, randomised crossover, ten trained men) into the source cell of the train-low row: an acute, next-day rise in peak fat oxidation after a depleting session plus a low-carbohydrate diet, with mitochondrial coupling control and efficiency unchanged and no performance outcome. The abstract gives no effect sizes, so none are quoted. Default unchanged (train-low only on easy sessions inside a fed week); level unchanged (B).
Verification 2026-10-01: all 32 cited REF entries read in the KB.md snapshot; every number, n and level next to a refId in Default, the decision table and the Before/After/Masters/Women/Vegetarian paragraphs matches its entry except the items listed.
Verification 2026-10-01: Level B is honest — daily targets on A consensus with the elite-to-amateur transfer named as open, timing rows on small B/B+ crossovers, example days labelled practice. No LEVEL-OVERALL.
Verification 2026-10-01: consistent with the frameworks it points to — SYNTH-02 (race morning 1-4 g/kg, REF-065), SYNTH-64 (REF-819, REF-891 loading), SYNTH-54 (deficit placement).
Verification 2026-10-01: the title's 'meal timing is a smaller lever than the daily totals' is an inference (REF-748 calls timing and distribution benefits 'equivocal'; the SYNTH's own 'Does not show' says no block-level timing trial exists) — left as is, not flagged.
Revision 2026-10-02: added one sentence from REF-1007 (B+, meta-analysis, 16 small RCTs) to the time-restricted-eating bullet under red flags: energy intake pointed down but not significantly, small body-mass and body-fat% reductions, performance tests unchanged, certainty very low to moderate, no REDs indicator pooled.The existing inference (a compressed window often becomes a deficit) is left as an inference — the pooled intake estimate is in that direction but not significant. No default changed.
Revision 2026-10-02: added REF-1007 to the cross-references.
Revision 2026-10-02: REF-1009 (Gawelczyk 2026, Nutrients, review of 33 studies of low-carbohydrate and ketogenic diets in trained athletes; graded C+ after full-text appraisal — vote-counting with no pooled estimate in the abstract or outcome tables, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale applied to dietary trials, commentaries, conference abstracts, a review, a consensus statement and an unrelated EEG study counted among the 'studies', contradictory counts) folded into the red flag 'Do not confuse train-low with a low-carbohydrate diet': the fat-oxidation rise and the exercise-economy impairment as the review reports them (shares of studies), plus the appraisal that its '1-week adaptation threshold' is not supported by its own tables (two sources at ≤7 days; the 3-week and 31-day studies it records as impaired are counted as maintained).The line agrees with REF-486; no default changed; level unchanged (B).
Revision 2026-10-02: SYNTH-02 was checked and not patched — it has no line on low-carbohydrate diets (only a cross-reference to the low-carbohydrate arguments).
Revision 2026-10-09: the two-sessions row and the cross-references point to SYNTH-85. Rows and level unchanged.