SYNTH-72 · Guide

A missed session or a broken week

Drop the easy one, move a key one only into a clean slot, never stack to catch up, and restart from the calendar instead of repaying the debt; the base measures no cost for a few missed days, and a sudden jump in weekly running distance is the risk it does measure, in runners

B-limited, mixed evidenceMostly from recreational to highly trained athletesWritten before October 2026, being re-checked

The question it answers

One or more planned sessions were missed (work, travel, family, a bad night): what is dropped, what is moved and where, what must not end up back-to-back, when the week is written off, and what the next week looks like. Illness and breaks beyond two weeks are SYNTH-36 (C+).

Default (what to prescribe first)

1

Do not repay missed training. Not from a study; the base's own practice: missed minutes are gone; the rest of the week is re-planned from today forward and never exceeds the week as it was planned. SYNTH-26 (B) states the same as inference: never add hard sessions to compensate for missing hours.

2

Rank what is left: key sessions first, then the long session, then the lift, then easy volume. Not from a study; the base's own practice.

What supports the order: in general populations endurance was held for up to 15 weeks on as little as 2 sessions/week or 33-66% less volume, only when intensity was maintained, and the review itself says data are insufficient for athletes (REF-587, B+, narrative review); a review of detraining gives the same recipe — keep intensity, reduce frequency only moderately, cut volume markedly (REF-374, B+, narrative review).

3

A missed easy session is dropped. A missed key session is moved only into a clean slot: an easy or off day before it and ≥48 h to the next key session (the gaps are house practice, SYNTH-70, B-). No clean slot → drop it and do the next key session as planned.

4

Next week starts as written, not heavier (not from a study; the base's own practice). After 7+ missed days in a row, step back first (table below).

Decision (who → what)

What to do with the missed session — amateurs, Tier 1-3; every row is practice unless a refId carries the claim.

MissedDoSource and how sure
Easy or recovery sessionDrop it. Do not add its minutes to another dayPractice. Volume is the variable that can be cut most while fitness holds (REF-374, B+; REF-587, B+, general populations)
Key session (VO2max, threshold), clean slot exists this weekMove it there, unchangedIn 15 male cyclists, four HIT sessions timed by a submaximal test instead of a fixed schedule gave a 40-km TT gain of 48 ± 42 s vs 8 ± 45 s at the same total dose (REF-753, B-, groups differed at baseline). Inference: a hard session done on a better day is not a lost session; the study moved sessions by a test, not by a diary
Key session, no clean slotDrop it. Never place it the day before or after another key session to "fit it in"Practice (SYNTH-70, SYNTH-28, B: 48-72 h between hard days is a house convention). In training, one Giro podium rider never went hard more than 2 days running (REF-080, C+, n=1, Tier 5 — transfer)
Two key sessions left, room for oneDo one; make the other easyPractice. One HIT session every 7-10 days on top of easy riding gave very likely larger 4 mmol/L and 40-min power than easy riding alone over an 8-week transition in 13 well-trained cyclists (REF-166, B). Inference: one quality session keeps a week alive
Long ride (cyclist)Move to any free day, or ride it shortened; it may sit next to a key session if kept below VT1HRV was back in 5-10 min after 60-120 min below VT1 in 9 highly trained runners (REF-161, B — transfer to cycling and to amateurs; longer rides untested). 24-48 h to the next key session is SYNTH-70 practice
Long run (runner)Move only with 48-72 h to the next key session; otherwise run it shorter or drop itAfter 3 days × 2.5 h, 13 trained runners had 133% higher CK and 87% more soreness than 22 trained cyclists (REF-235, B+); the 48-72 h is SYNTH-70 practice. The length of the weekly longest run correlated with economy durability (r = −0.67, 26 well-trained men, cross-sectional, REF-160, B) — a reason to protect it, not proof
Heavy lower-body liftDrop it if the only free slot is within 24 h before a quality session; do not let a moved lift land thereA hard strength session impairs the next endurance session for "several hours to days" (REF-328, B+, narrative review, no hours); the 24 h is SYNTH-31 (B) practice. Strength was held on 1 session/week in general populations (REF-587)
Session missed because of a short nightEndurance key session: move it a day; strength, speed or skill work: train in the morning rather than the evening (revised 2026-10-12)Across 69 studies (n=959, 89% men) ≤6 h of sleep cut performance ~7.6%; the abstract says afternoon/evening tasks were impaired and morning tasks largely spared, but the full text's pooled table shows AM −5.42% vs PM −8.31%, and endurance tasks were impaired at either time (AM −6.50%, PM −3.56%; not formally compared — the authors read it as irrespective of time of day) (REF-204, A-, single nights only) (corrected 2026-10-12). After 30 h awake 10 team-sport men sprinted slower with lower glycogen and unchanged RPE (REF-384, B — transfer)

How many missed days change the plan — complete rest; reduced training with intensity kept limits the losses (REF-374).

GapNext stepSource and how sure
1-3 daysNothing changes. Resume the plan where the calendar isPractice; no entry prices this window. In 300,000 recreational marathoners over 50% had complete stops of up to and including 6 days in a build per the abstract (its Results instead report a stop of at least 7 days in about 55-58%; corrected 2026-10-12), and those were the comparison baseline, not a measured zero (REF-941, B+, training logs, running only)
4-6 daysResume as written; first day back easy, the first key session on day 2 or 3Practice; still inside the short-stop baseline of REF-941. SYNTH-36 uses the same cut-off: under a week is a rest; this card and that one step back from day 7, where REF-941 starts to measure a cost (the cut-off itself is the base's convention)
7-14 daysStep back: repeat the last completed week or start below it, then continue; in a marathon build, re-set the goal instead of chasing the lost trainingIn recreational marathoners a complete stop of ≥ 7 days went with a 5-8% slower finish than the same runner's undisrupted marathon, more when late in the build (5.2% vs 4.4%) (REF-941, B+, observational: the cause of the stop travels with it). In 6 well-trained runners 15 days of detraining cut VO2max 4% and time in an intense submaximal run 25%; 15 days of retraining restored VO2max but performance was still 9% below (REF-164, B, no control). The step-back size is practice
15 days or more, or any illnessGo to SYNTH-367 endurance-trained people lost 7% of VO2max in 21 days of inactivity, and oxidative enzymes fell with a half-time of ~12 days (REF-377, B). Reduced, not stopped: 21 recreational runners held to <2 h/wk after a marathon lost 6.0% of plasma volume and 10.3% of left ventricular mass within 4 wk (REF-942, B, uncontrolled)

When to write the week off. Not from a study; the base's own practice: if three or more days are gone, or both key sessions are, stop rearranging. Use what remains for one key session with a clean day before it plus easy work, and start the next week as planned.

What must not be created by rearranging (all Tier 1-3, practice unless cited): two key sessions on adjacent days; a long run within 48 h of intervals; a lift in the 24 h before a quality session (SYNTH-31); strength and endurance in one session when they can sit ≥3 h apart — the explosive-strength penalty of concurrent training was concentrated in same-session designs (REF-330, A, healthy untrained-to-active adults — transfer); a weekend carrying the whole week.

How to progress / periodise

The week after a short week is the planned week, not the planned week plus the debt. Runners who raised weekly distance by 20-60% had 22.6 percentage points more injuries at 21 days than those who raised it by <20% (95% CI 0.9-44.3; 261 recreational runners; no difference at 56 and 98 days; REF-623, B+).Inference: returning to the habitual load after one short week was not what the cohort tested; going above it to catch up resembles the jump it did test (week-on-week increases in a race build, not catch-up weeks).
No percentage is a rule. A review of 4 studies found very limited evidence, and a 10% and a 24% weekly increase did not differ in risk (REF-565, B+); no study shows a causal effect of the acute:chronic ratio on injury (REF-365, C, commentary). Ramp rules: SYNTH-29 (C+).
Cyclists: the injury evidence is from runners. Inference: for a rider the cost of a catch-up week is fatigue and a spoiled next key session, not tissue injury (SYNTH-29 makes the same caveat).
A planned compressed block is not improvised stacking. Five 30/15 sessions in 6 days followed by 6 easy days raised power at VO2max 3.7% vs 0.7% in well-trained cyclists (REF-048, B, non-randomised). Inference: that design includes 6 easy days; an amateur squeezing missed intervals into a weekend has none.
Repeated broken weeks mean the plan is too big. Not from a study; the base's own practice: if two of the last four weeks were cut, re-plan on the hours actually trained (SYNTH-26). A narrative review argues that intervals should be dosed to be repeatable inside a consistent programme over years, not maximised per session (REF-468, B+, position piece).
A week broken by work or family stress is not followed by a heavier one. In 44 healthy sedentary adults on an identical 2-week programme, those who rated their psychological resources higher and stressors fewer beforehand gained more maximal power (r = 0.45), and the most stressed gained very little or nothing (REF-944, B, correlation, Tier 0 — transfer to trained athletes is inference; adjusting load to stress was not tested).
Masters: same triage; widen gaps on recovery signals, not on age alone — any age effect on recovery is smaller than assumed and largely training status (REF-598, B, narrative review, no hours). Keep the intensity, cut a session's length first (SYNTH-35, C+, house practice).

When NOT to use it / red flags

Fever, chest symptoms, vomiting, or a session missed through illness: not a scheduling problem. Fever means no training (REF-609, C, clinical review); the return is SYNTH-36.
Sessions missed because the athlete could not face them or failed them: that is a readiness question — SYNTH-30 (B). Self-reported well-being tracks load better than objective markers (REF-368, A, systematic review).
Pain at one site in a runner: do not move sessions around it. Not from a study; the base's own practice: symptoms, not the calendar, gate the load; ramp rules are SYNTH-29.
Several short nights in a row: REF-204 covers single nights only. In 9 endurance cyclists/triathletes, three nights with time in bed cut by 30% (4.7-4.9 h of sleep) slowed a time trial by the third day (60.4 vs 58.8 min) with RPE not different, and extending time in bed by 30% made it faster by the fourth (REF-943, B, crossover; weeks of short sleep untested).Not from a study; the base's own practice: make that day's key session easy, judge it by output rather than feel, and reassess the next day.

What the evidence does and does not show

Shows: complete rest costs well-trained runners measurable performance by 15 days and it is not fully regained in 15 more (REF-164); VO2max is down 7% at 21 days (REF-377); reduced training holds fitness when intensity is kept (REF-374; REF-587, general populations); the timing of a hard session can move without loss in one small cycling study (REF-753); a 20-60% jump in weekly running distance went with more injuries over the next 21 days (REF-623); a short night impairs evening more than morning performance in the pooled data, while endurance tasks were impaired at either time (AM −6.50%, PM −3.56%; not formally compared — the authors read it as irrespective of time of day) (REF-204) (corrected 2026-10-12); three short nights slow a time trial without raising RPE (REF-943); a complete stop of ≥ 7 days in a marathon build goes with a 5-8% slower finish (REF-941, an association).
Does not show: any cost or absence of cost for 1-6 missed days in amateurs, or for any gap in cyclists; that making up a session is worse (or better) than dropping it; that the key-first ranking beats any other; a write-off threshold; any load-spike harm in cyclists; the 24 h and 48-72 h gaps, which are conventions in SYNTH-70 and SYNTH-31.Complete-rest samples are 6 and 7 people, from 1979 and 1984. The amateur data are observational (REF-941) or uncontrolled (REF-942).

Evidence gaps

The cost of stops shorter than a week, of reduced (not stopped) training inside a build, and of any gap in cyclists — no entry; REF-941 prices only complete stops of ≥ 7 days in marathoners, cause unknown.
Make-up or compressed sessions versus dropped sessions at the same weekly total — no trial known to the base.
Same weekly endurance volume in fewer, longer sessions ("weekend warrior") versus spread sessions, in athletes — no entry.
Short sleep over weeks and endurance training quality — no entry; REF-943 covers three nights.
Load spikes and injury or illness in cyclists — no entry.
Life stress and the training response in trained athletes, and whether adjusting load to stress helps — no entry; REF-944 is a correlation in sedentary adults.
How this entry was checked and changed
Why this level

(cessation studies with n=6-7 and a narrative review for the time course, B/B+; a B+ narrative review of general populations for the maintenance dose; B+ runner cohorts for the spike; a B+ log analysis of recreational marathoners for stops of a week or more; a B crossover for three short nights; an A- meta-analysis for sleep; the triage itself — what to drop, where to move, when to write the week off — is house practice that no trial tests)

Content correction 2026-09-27
Revision 2026-10-01: folded REF-941 (Feely 2023, 300,000 recreational marathoners, training logs). It prices complete stops of ≥ 7 days (5-8% slower marathon than the same runner's undisrupted one) and uses stops of up to 6 days as the baseline.The gap table therefore moves the boundary by one day: '4-7 days' became '4-6 days', '8-14 days' became '7-14 days', and Default item 4 says 7+ instead of 8+. The 1-6-day rows stay practice: the entry does not measure a zero cost, it uses those stops as the comparison.
Revision 2026-10-01: folded REF-943 (Roberts 2019, n = 9 crossover) into the 'several short nights' red flag, replacing 'the base has no entry on chronic restriction'; REF-944 (Ruuska 2012, sedentary adults, correlation) as a new progression line on stress weeks, labelled transfer; REF-942 (Pedlar 2018, uncontrolled, reduced training after a marathon) in the 15-days-or-more row.
Revision 2026-10-01: three Evidence-gap lines narrowed (short stops and cyclists; sleep over weeks; stress in trained athletes). Level unchanged at B-: the triage itself is still house practice, and the new entries are observational, uncontrolled or n = 9.
Verification 2026-10-01: all 27 cited entries opened in the KB.md snapshot; every number, n, design and level next to a refId matches the entry (REF-941, 942, 943, 944, 164, 377, 166, 623, 565, 753, 204, 384, 160, 235 checked figure by figure); no NUMBER, WRONG or LEVEL finding.
Verification 2026-10-01: transfer and inference labels are present on REF-161 (runners to cyclists), REF-080 (n=1, Tier 5), REF-166 (transition period), REF-330, REF-384, REF-944; the observational nature of REF-941 is stated each time it is used.
Verification 2026-10-01: no SOURCE flag: every cited entry has a DOI. REF-384's second byline half (Fullagar 2015) has no identifier, but the card uses only the Skein 2011 numbers.
Verification 2026-10-01: Level B- is honest: 1 row is evidence (short night), 6 are labelled practice, 9 are evidence plus a practice step; the levels quoted for SYNTH-26, 28, 29, 30, 31, 35, 36 match those cards' Level lines.
Verification 2026-10-01: the SYNTH-36 difference is two conventions meeting in the 7-10-day band, not a conflict between studies.
2026-10-01: the 4-6-day row no longer reports a disagreement with SYNTH-36: SYNTH-36's short-gap cut-off was moved from 'about ten days' to 'under a week', so both cards step back from day 7 (REF-941).
2026-10-01: level tags next to cited frameworks updated to their current levels after the independent audit.
Revision 2026-10-12 (owner decision): the short-night rule now splits by session type — a key endurance session moves a day, strength/speed/skill work may take the morning — because REF-204's full text shows endurance tasks impaired at either time of day (AM −6.50%, PM −3.56%; the authors: irrespective of time of day), while the pooled data favour the morning for other tasks. Level unchanged.